Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

late night thoughts or whatever...

on the "banality of evil"... i understand the concept of "evil people" being banal as in H*tler was in no way shape or form a genius, he was a racist piece of shit with literally no real talent. he wasn't even an specially good orator because there was no subtlety or real *art* in his speech, so him and people who attached/still attach themselves to his ideology i think of as banal. people are banal. most people even when well intentioned can be banal at times.
I do strongly disagree with the idea that *evil* itself can be viewed as banal because what banal, ill intentioned people, *evil* people can do, when they have power over any part of society, it has concequences and i do not believe said consequences can be seen as "banal" because it doesn't matter how stupid and "simple" the doer is, the victims of their "evil" will always be affected more deeply than anyone can imagine, and their suffering is not banal.
so evil in itself, in my opinion, cannot be categorized as banal.
tyrants, dictators, politicians, any figure exercising power over others in evil ways, are banal.
but what they do, however evil, will always have particular, concequences in other individuals that no matter the amount of times they tell their stories during/after the same evil will never be banal because personal experience as a consequence of the evil of others is never a banality.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
An evil person can be a good orator
Not all evil people are good orator

A person can be banal
A banal person can be a good person

A person can be racist
That same person can be a good orator

Hitler was a "good orator", because his audience was extremely receptive, and this allowed him to take control and cause evil.