Worse Bill in US History?

Like, for those that earn less than $200,000 per year, is there one single positive thing in this Bill for them?

Or is this Bill literally the Rich screwing everyone in every area?

[media=https://youtu.be/eK0iGlTh_58]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Kwek00 · 41-45, M

I wonder if there is a lawyer out here, that can explain what the consequences are of this clause:

Found on page 540, under "Subtitle C- Other Matters".

SOURCE: https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr1/BILLS-119hr1eh.pdf

Remember when all the MAGA folk were angry about big bills,... and that a bill should have a single toppic? Well... not when they are in office... like with pretty much with everyone of their complaints.

sstronaut

@Kwek00 From the internet

Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a court MAY issue a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order only if the person requesting it provides a bond to cover any costs and damages a wrongfully restrained defendant could incur. The Rule excludes the U.S. government and its agencies.

I'm not lawyer, but it sounds like it's handcuffing judges and saying that they can't preliminary injunction or temporary restraining orders UNLESS the person requesting one is BOTH

1) Rich enough to pay for the potential violations being caused against them

2) Willing and able to put the liquified money up

In other words, taking away power and rights away from judges and non-rich people.