Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

plokijhyugtfrdesdxfcgvhbjkml;;

I've been looking at the World War 1 version of Flames of War, and it stirred something in my mind which I can't seem to get rid of. It bugs me that we only ever see depictions of the Western Front, especially the later years when things like tanks started becoming more prominent.

There's so much more to it than that - literally three other fronts which were just as pointless and a waste of life - the Eastern Front, Italian Front, and Palestine - and that's not even counting Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck's campaign in Africa, the South Pacific rampage of the SMS Emden, the battles in the Caucasus between Ottoman and Russian armies, the uprising of the Arabs against the Ottomans, the Gallipoli campaign, the British push up the Euphrates river, and more I can't even think of/remember.

It's always just trench warfare, mud, and tanks. It's true that pretty much every army had a doctrine of digging in with trenches, but it's always Britain, France, and Germany which get the focus and I think that's deeply disappointing.

Hopefully someone can see where I'm coming from here. I'm also not sure why I'm so passionate or knowledgeable about this.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
The wall of text wasn't too bad, but it would be still easier to read if broken up into two or three paragraphs with blank lines between.

You make an important point too, and not only in the context of computer games.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@KiwiDan This is how I would divide it:
[quote
I've been looking ..
..
There's so much more to it ..
..
It's always just trench ..
[/quote]
KiwiDan · 31-35, M
@ninalanyon I'll do that now. Thanks :)
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@KiwiDan I find that when reading on a screen whether a mobile or a big monitor that I need text broken up into smaller visual chunks than when I am reading a paper book even when the type sizes and page sizes are similar.

 
Post Comment