This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpdate
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The history of the Global Warming. . . Fraud!

The history of the Global Warming Fraud

THE EXPOSÉ ON JULY 29, 2022

The current global warming scam isn’t a new one of course. Like most good scams this one has been around for a long time.

By Dr Vernon Coleman

In 1817, the President of the Royal Society in London warned that there had been ‘a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us’ and said that this would lead to changes in the accessibility of the Arctic Seas. It was nonsense, of course.

A century later, in 1922, the Washington Post warned that the Arctic was warming up, that icebergs were getting scarcer and in some places the seals were finding the water too hot.

In 1947, The West Australian, quoted a Dr Ahlmann, a Swedish geophysicist who was warning about a mysterious warming of the climate. And in 1958, the Sunday Telegraph in London warned that the climate is getting warmer.

Then the scaremongers suddenly went into reverse, and in the 1970s the experts warned that a new ice age could grip the world within the lifetime of present generations. Nigel Calder, a science writer, warned in a major television documentary on the BBC that the threat of a new ice age must stand alongside nuclear war as a source of wholesale death and misery. Calder claimed that the northern hemisphere had been cooling since 1950s and that the droughts in Africa and India were due to the ‘little ice age’.

In 1975, Newsweek magazine ran a story called, ‘The Cooling World’ and predicted the beginning of dramatic global cooling which might well lead to a drastic decline in food production. They talked about economic and social adjustments on a global scale. (In 2006, over 30 years later, Newsweek published a correction.)

The bottom line is that politicians, journalists and experts are forever warning us of terrible things that are about to happen. The invariable rider is that they might well be able to save us from the terrible future which they predict, if we give them vast amounts of money, enormous prestige and a full page profile in the Guardian newspaper.

The BBC and other corrupt and blatantly dishonest news organisations now claim that global warming is accepted and need not be debated or discussed. This is a lie of course. (The BBC makes the same bizarre claim about almost all contentious scientific issues.)

Global warming is simply a pseudoscientific cult for self-important hypocrites and the people who promote the global warming myth are richly rewarded for their obedience while those who dare to question it are severely punished.

Governments, big industries (with a vested interest in the changes being forced upon us), ruthless lobbyists and, of course, the United Nations keep up the daily terror through a constant bombardment of lies, deceits and pseudoscience. It is, to use a felicitous phrase devised by my friend Dr Colin Barron, a seemingly unending example of ‘death porn fear’.

The UK Government says that tackling global warming will require a host of new incentives, laws, rules, bans, taxes, appliance standards and institutional innovations. In November 2020, as the UK’s economy fell apart, the Government announced another package of £12 billion worth of investment in green infrastructure such as cycle lanes. At the same time there was huge pressure for ‘climate denial’ to be criminalised and for those questioning the new cultish dogma to be prosecuted instead of merely being persecuted. (It is worth remembering that in 2015, former US vice-president Al Gore said that ‘deniers deserve to be punished’. Gore was, of course, the presenter of an infamous video which has been proven to contain misleading pseudoscience.

Much the same is happening everywhere.

In the US, President Joe Biden wants to spend $2 trillion ‘decarbonising the US economy’. The European Union has earmarked 30% of its $880 billion recovery fund for climate measures.

Today, it is estimated that 85% of all our energy comes from fossil fuels and the plan is to replace all this with solar and wind power. Both the EU and China have committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions though this will, inevitably, involve a good deal of cheating, chicanery and lying.

* * * * * *
Endgame by Vernon Coleman is available as a paperback, a hardback and an eBook.

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/29/history-of-the-global-warming-fraud/
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
This is the same Vernon Coleman who in the 1980s claimed AIDS was a hoax epidemic. Even if you do not accept the science of climate change, reducing dependence on finite resources and making cities safer for cyclists and pedestrians seems a pretty good use of public money to me.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
TexChik · F
The libs have a very long list of global disaster claims that have never, even remotely, happened. Anyone that believes that man can alter the planet through living on it or through sheer will and spending money was born to be a democrat/liberal/liar.
TexChik · F
@Entwistle spare me your bullsh*t. You libs are full of it. Please explain how money is going to fix it
Carissimi · F
CO2 was higher in the the Pliocene Epoch that I wrote a post about it this week. The sea levels were higher. Funny thing is, humans (if they were even around in that epoch) had nothing to do with CO2. @Entwistle
Carissimi · F
https://similarworlds.com/environment/4409223-Does-Anyone-See-the-Discrepancy-Here@Entwistle This was written by a Leftist.
JustNik · 51-55, F
No matter what you want to hear, you can find someone somewhere singing your song, but I confess this one really baffles me. Whether or not you think we’re the sole cause of anything, it’s pretty much just common sense that what we do at the rate we do it will not go without consequences so we should take advantage of new technologies to do better wherever possible. I don’t get why you wouldn’t want to do that. You are essentially just arguing that you wish to pollute willy nilly and your gripe is that anyone has the gall to tell you you shouldn’t. Are big CEOs not rich enough for your taste?? I just truly don’t get what you expect to gain. It sure doesn’t make you look smarter.
Carissimi · F
It’s a scam. There is such a thing as climate change, but it’s the natural cycles of the planet. They use it as an excuse for taking more freedoms away from us, and gaining power and resources for themselves. Notice how they try to scare us about our carbon footprint, while they carry on as normal, flying their private jets, and eating meat.
GeniUs · 56-60, M
@Carissimi Yes that's* different from saying CO2 certainly in my world.
edit: *greenhouse gases
GeniUs · 56-60, M
@Carissimi
You don’t seem to remember what you wrote.
Classic gaslighting, I wager you don't see yourself like that.
Carissimi · F
You are ridiculous. All I did was show your own words to you, and you call it gaslighting. I see you now that you are one of those Woke lunatics that says something then bare face lies even when reality and evidence is presented to you. You must be a Leftist because they will swear it’s not raining and the sun is out, even when it’s pouring rain that everyone else can see. That’s gaslighting, and you are the gaslighter here. I want nothing to do with you. @GeniUs
Namor69 · 41-45, M
Watch: Jerome Corsi talks new book TV: Climate movement is ”anti-God, anti-capitalist, anti-human’ & ‘about totalitarian control’

https://www.climatedepot.com/2022/08/02/watch-jerome-coris-talks-new-book-tv-climate-movement-is-anti-god-anti-capitalist-anti-human-about-totalitarian-control/

New York Times Best Selling Author Jerome Corsi on his new book, “The Truth About Energy, Global Warming and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation.” He shares scientific facts exposing the true political intentions of the Green New Deal.

The Politics of Lies Regarding Energy and Climate Change

[media=https://youtu.be/HoukAezCmTk]
[@3:07 mark]
Jul 29, 2022 - New York Times Best Selling Author Jerome Corsi on his new book, "The Truth About Energy, Global Warming and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation." He shares scientific facts exposing the true political intentions of the Green New Deal.

SW-User
It's not a scam lol.

China and Russia (yes, I know) are two of the biggest polluters and if they continue emitting CO2 at the rate they are, we obviously won't be able to do much about this issue. The U.S is also one of the main contributors. If they did further increase what small reductions they have been able to make, it still wouldn't make that much difference.

The Western world has outsourced a lot to China and India...again that doesn't correspond with a "plan" to resolve or improve the climate change problem, so I don't see much of a solution to it. I agree that it's wrong for people to be preached to. They should just ignore it and go about living their lives normally.
GeniUs · 56-60, M
And finally @Carissimi even though you have blocked me, you clearly have no understanding of how global warming even works take 10 minutes to educate yourself on this and you'll stop coming across as the fool you are.
carpediem · 61-69, M
I believe the climate is changing. Where I am currently sitting used to be a massive glacier. So the climate has definitely changed since then. But I don't believe man is responsible. I do agree clean air and water is critical. And it would be great if solar power and other sources could power all our energy needs. Maybe some day they will. 🤷‍♂️ But not today. And not for a very long time until technologies catch up. And they have a VERY long way to go.

The "climate denier" approach is the same old BS leftist use to divide people. They do it all the time. It's tired and old already.
So afraid of reality that you deny it at any cost. Stick your head in the sand and deny it.
DownTheStreet · 56-60, M
You can’t get funding for research on climate (or just about anything scientific these days) unless you aim to further the establishment agenda. No finding, no research, and no papers.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@DownTheStreet Funding is allocated for impartial scientific research. Researchers are by and large serious scientists, not politicians with an 'agenda'. If few papers are written denying a human role in climate change, it would seem reasonable to draw inferences from a scientific consensus.

Btw, Dr Vernon Cole is a medical doctor (or at least he was until he deregistered in 2016). He has no obvious qualification to speak with authority on environmental science.
DownTheStreet · 56-60, M
@SunshineGirl impartial. That’s funny.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
It's a scam; the largest ever perpetuated in modern history, but a scam nonetheless. Similar to a charity scam, politicize & monetize the climate and convince gullible people that throwing money at it will somehow change/fix it.
Namor69 · 41-45, M
[media=https://youtu.be/hatkGFTPyUE]
JRE #1719 w/Michael Shellenberger
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
Feeding the fear!!
carpediem · 61-69, M
@Namor69 Disaster is always about 10 years away from today.
Namor69 · 41-45, M
[media=https://youtu.be/ctnAeubr5Go]
Namor69 · 41-45, M
[media=https://youtu.be/BHAf7zNb4mM]

 
Post Comment