This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
I mean, the buildings were there one day and gone the next. I'm not sure how anybody can claim it didn't happen.
Questions do remain, however.
Questions do remain, however.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire It was an elaborate insurance scam.
"After a protracted dispute with insurers over the amount of coverage for rebuilding World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5, a series of court decisions determined that a maximum of $4.55 billion was payable, and settlements were reached with the insurers in 2007."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein#:~:text=September%2011%20attacks,-Main%20article%3A%20September&text=After%20a%20protracted%20dispute%20with,with%20the%20insurers%20in%202007.
"After a protracted dispute with insurers over the amount of coverage for rebuilding World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5, a series of court decisions determined that a maximum of $4.55 billion was payable, and settlements were reached with the insurers in 2007."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein#:~:text=September%2011%20attacks,-Main%20article%3A%20September&text=After%20a%20protracted%20dispute%20with,with%20the%20insurers%20in%202007.