Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Greenland forces Trump-linked US oil firm to delay drilling

US envoy had claimed Americans could be extracting crude by as early as next year.

By Tom Burgis/The Guardian
Wed 12 Aug 2026 14.00 EDT

Greenland authorities have forced a US oil company connected to Donald Trump to postpone drilling wells in the Arctic territory, defying claims by the US president’s envoy that Americans could be extracting crude by next year.

Amid Trump’s imperialist threats, tensions have been rising on Greenland’s eastern coast after the oil company brought drilling equipment ashore in July without permission, drawing a “strong warning” from the government.

Just week before Greenland Energy intended to sink its first wells into the tundra, the government said on Thursday: “The necessary regulatory process cannot be completed, and the necessary approvals cannot therefore be obtained before the planned start of drilling.”

It said that during talks Greenlandic officials had expressed concern that the timetable was too tight to assess the environmental and social impact.

The authorities will have to decide whether to sanction drilling in a protected wetland that is home to rare birds and the muskoxen on which local hunters depend. At the earliest, drilling could now commence in the winter of 2027, the government and the company said.

That is a long way off the prediction made as recently as May by Jeff Landry, the hard-right Louisiana governor whom Trump named as his envoy to Greenland. He said after a visit that oil supposedly lying under Greenland could ease the energy crisis caused by the US attack on Iran.

Landry, whose stated goal is to “make Greenland a part of the US”, said: “We could have those barrels on production within 10 months or so.”

Robert Price, the Greenland Energy chief executive, who maintains that oil worth $1tn could lie under the remote Jameson Land region, said: “Greenland Energy remains committed to advancing its oil exploration programme responsibly and in accordance with Greenland’s regulatory process, and in full compliance with Greenlandic authorities.”

Price added: “We will use this time to refine our plans and deepen relationships with local communities, strategic partners and relevant authorities.”

Since a rich friend put the idea of acquiring Greenland in Trump’s head during his first term, the president has threatened to do so by buying it from Denmark, seizing it with military force or cutting a deal.

Shareholders in Greenland Energy had been hoping for a “Trump pump”, a presidential endorsement that could send the New York-listed stock rocketing. But on Wednesday the price fell by more than a third after the drilling delay was announced.

Price had said a ship bringing 300 containers of drilling kit would set sail from Canada for Greenland in September, with a first well to be sunk the following month. He told a community meeting – falsely – that Greenland had granted permission for the company to start landing equipment.

Greenland Energy’s British partner 80 Mile said in an update for investors on Wednesday that the delay was due to the need to “complete the permitting and regulatory approval process”.

80 Mile holds exploration licences granted before Greenland stopped issuing them in 2021, citing the climate crisis.

Greenland Energy, formed last year, has announced plans to spend $60m (£44m) raised from investors to fund drilling in exchange for a majority stake in the project.

Its representatives have said its oil venture is “not related to American annexation”, yet the company has established multiple connections to the Trump administration.

Phil McGraw, better known as the chatshow host Dr Phil, has a deal with Greenland Energy to “capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters” for a documentary series to be broadcast on television and social media. He recently appeared in the Oval Office alongside Trump, having served on the president’s religious freedom commission.

A US navy veteran who is working on Golden Dome, the missile defence plan for which Trump says controlling Greenland is “vital”, sits on Greenland Energy’s board. And Kenneth Griffin, a Wall Street billionaire who gave $1m towards Trump’s second inauguration, bought 9% of Greenland Energy’s shares in April.

Rod McIllree, 80 Mile’s boss, said: “While we are disappointed that the timing of the Jameson drilling programme has been impacted, the company remains fully committed to advancing this highly prospective project.”
Top | New | Old
Spotpot · 46-50, M
The world is rejcting Trump except China they love him make China great agian.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I wonder -

1) If any large petroleum reserves have been indentified under Greenland's land and surrounding sea-bed; or if the project is exploratory.


2) The legal position of an American company and President imposing themselves on a foreign country, with no attempt to seek permission before landing any property.


3) What Donald Trump - with only two and half years left as President - will do if Greenland refuses permission and orders the oil-company to clear out. (I think he would have no legal option but to accept his loss.)


4) If the Greenland government has been "got at" behind the scenes to try to render it powerless. Somehow I think the Greenlanders and Danes have too much moral fibre for that.


5) How a mere State Governor can say Greenland will be taken over by the USA, unless Trump told him to say that. And what they might say if he if Greenland expels him, as it can do.

The same man who reckoned oil from Greenland (if it exists) would ease the crisis caused by the war on Iran! Well, Mr. Landry, who attacked whom? Besides, even if any oil is found it will be a long time before any gurgles into US refineries... for USA use. Long enough for that war to be ended. And for Greenland and Denmark to copy Norway by nationalising its own oil and gas deposits for its own benefit.

Landry's statement will only encourage ideas that the war was a clumsy attempt to skew the world's oil supplies in the USA's favour. I cannot judge that but could understand why people might claim so.


6) The identities of the "strategic partners" in that statement by Robert Price - the same man who lied about permission having been granted.


7) Dr. Phil McGraw's description of Greenland Energy as "wildcatters" is illuminating although he seems a supporter of it. I'd always understood "wildcat" drilling meant "speculative", and was coined in the late-19C when minerals prospecting and extraction was not very scientific, it involved no planning permission and cared nothing for the local residents and environment. If so, is that an accurate summary of this company?


Defence:

8) Greenland being an autonomous province of a NATO nation, I wonder why Trump thinks it necessary to annexe it to place defences there, rather than negotiating leasing the site - or even simply placing the facility within the USAAF base already in Greenland.

Or indeed thinks he needs them anyway: Greenland is far further from the USA than he might think and many maps imply. Do Trump and his military top-brass see the island a sort of decoy, rather as the USA placed nuclear weapons in the UK during the Cold War, but refused to consider asking British permission for their use?

For his "Golden Dome" to be effective, I suppose it would need facilities right round the world. If so I would suggest Trump studies a map showing the Earth from above the North Pole. Russia takes about half the Arctic circumference and although its North-East extremity is pretty well empty, it is only seventy miles from oil-rich Alaska (nearest coastal separation). Also, Russia, China and North Korea own much of the Western Pacific coast between them; with only Japan "in the way".*


Finally...

9) I wonder why President Trump imagines the United States of America has any legal or moral right simply to enter a foreign country and take what it wants for its own advantage, even threaten to seize the whole country, without no proper request, invitation or permission.

That's what Spain, France, Britain and Holland did in the 18th Century, and what China and Russia are attempting now.

So who is next on Donald John Trump's letter to Santa?


++++++

*Perhaps unsurprisingly Elon Musk is among an assortment of odd-bods who proposed a railway tunnel under the Bering Straits to connect the USA to Russia, and indirectly, China. Through very wild tundra, a seismically active region that could fracture the tunnel, and a break-of-gauge for the tracks. I can't see it happening, but one might ask their motives. Let alone sense.
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
It would not be wise for Greenland to let anyone or anything connected to Donald Trump touch their soil or breathe their air.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
I am starting to think I know where all the creative spriptwriting talent in Hollywood has gone. Trumps White House. All this stuff is so much fiction.😷

 
Post Comment