Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Influencers sold the world a fantasy Dubai – and now it’s gone in a puff of missile smoke

The city was portrayed as an aspirational place to live, but now those who moved there are realising the precarity that comes with being an economic migrant

By Gaby Hinsliff/The Guardian
Fri 6 Mar 2026 03.00 EST

To be fooled by a mirage, you needn’t be lost in the desert. Sometimes, the illusion is strongest just when you thought you were safely home, posting from the pool about your teenage daughter’s spa party and your own glittering life in a city where “the possibilities are endless”, as they tend to be for billionaires’ daughters living in tax havens. Only then does the fantasy explode in a puff of intercepted missile smoke, leaving just another woman in her pyjamas telling Instagram (as Petra Ecclestone did at the weekend) that she moved to Dubai “to feel safe” and war was never mentioned in the small print.

Who could have guessed that living a few hundred miles as the drone flies from Tehran might have risks? Certainly not the anonymous hedge funder who fumed to the Financial Times that “the trade was not that you were getting exposed to geopolitics”.

But if it’s hard to sympathise with the super-rich, as they discover that there are some things money can’t buy, then they are not the only Britons trapped in the Gulf. The deal Dubai offered economic migrants – which is what Britons seeking a better life in the Gulf are, much as some will hate the label – was a kind of real-life Truman Show: a sunny, shiny, sterilised low-crime haven for anyone itching to get rich or stay that way, sustained by stiff penalties for anyone publicly shattering its illusions.

Alongside the wealth managers, property agents and taut-skinned trophy wives who always accompany the mega-rich, it attracted its share of Reform-supporting X blue ticks banging on from their beach clubs about London supposedly going to the dogs; influencers seeking luxury backdrops for their unboxing videos; crypto guys, tech bros, and assorted hustlers. But many rungs down the financial ladder behind them came an army of younger temporary workers to clean their pools and nanny for their kids and teach them pilates, many of whom have families back home now worried sick. Gloat if you must that they are now finding out why other people stay home in the rain, but schadenfreude is a grim look when fellow human beings are sleeping in their basements as the tyrannical Iranian regime tries to kill them.

An estimated 300,000 Britons have been trapped across the Gulf by the war: everyone from honeymooning couples just changing planes to business travellers, aid workers getting a few days’ break from war zones and families visiting relatives. Most were no more expecting war to come to them than we were back home in Britain, where it will shortly be arriving in the less lethal shape of rising gas bills and petrol prices, disrupted supply chains, diaspora communities waiting anxiously for news of loved ones, and all the toxic anger that rising inflation might unleash against a Labour government just as economic recovery looked within reach.

This war is weaponising interconnectedness, or the myriad ways in which distant shocks around the globe are brought closer to home thanks to the movement of people and money and goods, and TikToks filmed by someone who feels like a friend because you watch them every day, chatting as they do their makeup.

Why is Iran, under fire, provoking the wrath and not the sympathy of the Arab world by raining drones on Dubai hotels, Saudi oil refineries, Qatari liquid natural gas facilities? To make its neighbours put pressure on the Americans, obviously, but also to show Washington that if it’s going down then it’s taking the neighbourhood with it. Iran’s strategy is to make the wider Gulf look too dangerous a place to invest, seek winter sun, or rely on for energy supplies: to sever its links to the outside world. A pariah regime that is itself closed off and isolated is attacking countries whose prosperity depends on being open, using their connections to the west for leverage. And Dubai is its nearest, most clearly westernised target, vulnerable to pressure because it is built on people transactional enough to move where the money does.

I’m writing this from France, where my morning newspaper reckons Bali is the new Dubai for influencers: hot, endlessly Instagrammable, but cheaper and crucially not next door to Iran. So maybe they will just pack up their camera tripods and move on, hotly but fruitlessly pursued by the demands of the Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, for Britons overseas to be made to pay tax in case our military has to rescue them again. (Let’s just say they might want to Google “tensions in the South China Sea”.)

But personally, if there is one thing I want more from Dubai’s content-creating gym bros and wellness girlies than their money, it’s for them to use that influence. Now they know how it feels to pack up and run from falling bombs, I’d like them to interrupt the #sponsored content just long enough to reflect on lessons learned from this luxury version of a refugee experience. Why not use those connections to the outside world that Iran seems so keen to destroy, and talk to their millions of followers on TikTok and Instagram and YouTube about the insecurity of the migrant path and how moving abroad for a better life – as millions do daily in far more life-threatening circumstances – isn’t as cushy as some pretend?

If you want to get rich in Dubai or die trying, I’m prepared to accept that that’s your business. But only if you feel the same about every other economic migrant: for, like it or not, you’re one of them.



Gaby Hinsliff is a Guardian columnist.
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
The Guardian is traditionally somewhat Left-leaning - supporting Labour but not Jerermy Corbyn's "Your Party" lot - so I can make some allowances for this criticism of the sort of people attracted to Dubai, but Gaby Hinsliff's article makes me glad I do not move in those sort of circles!

That even before Iran started hurling missiles at them, which to be fair no-one could seriously expect until a few days ago.

They seem to have very shallow lives anyway, living in artificial seaside resorts fringing deserts.


As for taxes, if they have investments in Britain those should be taxed at source anyway, within Britain; usually by the investment-fund managers or stockbrokers involved. As they do with the income-tax on my tiny block of shares whose dividends are garden fish-pond rather than mansion's swimming-pool scale. Though of course those traders will know all the loopholes!
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Around 120,000 UK expats have requested diplomatic assistance since the start of the Trump War. It's a massive, unexpected strain on resources. Priority should be given to salaried workers and holiday makers. Those who have moved to avoid paying tax or to make a political statement about crime levels in London should wait their turn at the back of the queue.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, for Britons overseas to be made to pay tax in case our military has to rescue them again.
I used to think that the Liberal Party was one of measured common sense. I'm pretty sure it was in the days of Jo Grimond.

Does Davey think that all of the roughly six million British citizens who live abroad live in tax havens? Perhaps I should apply for Norwegian citizenship in case I need to renounce my British one.

It seems that politicians of every stripe in the UK want to import some foolish piece of US policy while decrying each other for it.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ninalanyon I haven't seen that, but it seems on face value to be a knee jerk simplistic suggestion which, as you say, is not the usual Lib Dem way. Since they have little chance of becoming a governing party any time soon, I think we can safely not worry about such ideas.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@FreddieUK It's a quote from @JSul3's post of Gaby Hinsliff's article. It also appears on the LibDem's website at
https://www.libdems.org.uk/press/release/davey-only-right-tax-exiles-start-paying-taxes-to-fund-the-armed-forces
I suppose that if I were to interpret it charitably then he meant only those who live in countries where they pay no income tax. But he couples it with:
just like such Americans have to pay US taxes.
But that is not how it works for Americans. They have to submit tax returns regardless of where they live even if they do not actually end up paying tax to the US, it doesn't only affect 'tax expats'. This would add a totally unnecessary burden to the majority of Britons living abroad. In addition the Revenue service would have to process many millions more tax returns than before while receiving comparatively little extra tax revenue.

As for there being no danger of it happening because the LibDems will not be in government, well I'm not so sanguine. I could easily see other parties picking up such things as they flail about trying to find that magic key to electoral victory.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ninalanyon I can see why it would be of concern to you and sympathise. I am against the US system.
swirlie · 31-35, F
I've been to Dubai many times and what Gaby describes is 100% correct.

I never called Dubai "home" because as she eludes to, Dubai was built on a foundation of fantasy and fiction, no different than what is found up and down the coast of California, which of course is America's Dubai but with far less class.

I never once felt comfortable in my hotel in Dubai, whether in my room watching western TV stations at night, or lying around a salt water pool by day in my bikini while pretending the salt I could taste in my mouth from a recent swim I'd had in 45*C afternoon air temperatures, came from an ocean that doesn't exist despite the apparent sand beach that goes on forever from the edge of my hotel pool.

The reason I never felt comfortable in my hotel was because I felt I was trapped in a location on earth that basically had the waterway to the ocean controlled by Iran, not Dubai.

I was always happy to go to Dubai on business, but I was always happier to leave again by air. Yes, I always had fun while there and yes, it wasn't always strictly business.

But the thing is, like Gaby talks about, there isn't actually anything there in Dubai that's "real". Everything is fake and nothing got there without human input. And without human maintenance, it will all return to what it was in the beginning, which is just sand in the desert over time.

California is just like Dubai in that respect, in that it's all fake, contrived and illusionary, but attracts those minds who need to spend time in a fantasy land of dreams and home-made illusion, which means none of it is real in America either.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@ArishMell
Dubai is more like a gambling casino ambiance than a vacation resort. When you arrive there, you are expected to contribute something to the cause immediately... be it wheelbarrow loads of money, or labor in some form.

Think of walking into a gambling casino in Las Vegas and just walking around but not actually betting on any games nor playing the slot machines.

Eventually, someone will approach you and ask what you are doing there? The same analogy applies to Dubai.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@swirlie I'm glad I'll never go there....
swirlie · 31-35, F
@ArishMell
You won't be missing anything except sand in your shoes and it's also hotter than 40C each day by 10am... 🥵
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
A lot of sense being written here.
slightly out of my price range. LOL
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
And fled there so as NOT to pay taxes and llook down their noses at others
But now whining because they are block in Dubai and want to be rescued immediately
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
I've never been attracted to Dubai. It's like Disney, all fake.

 
Post Comment