Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Breaking: Trump regime cuts $260 million in Medicaid funds to Minnesota

& stops new durable medical equipment supplier enrollment nationally for 6 months to supposedly "combat fraud.

By Charles Gaba/SubStack News
Feb 25, 2026

Today at the White House, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Dr. Mehmet Oz announced new steps to crack down on fraud in Medicare and Medicaid to protect patients and taxpayers and improve affordability.

The actions include deferring $259.5 million of quarterly federal Medicaid funding in Minnesota to prevent payment of questionable claims while further investigation is completed; a nationwide moratorium on Medicare enrollment for certain Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) suppliers; and a nationwide call to action for Americans to support fraud prevention, including stakeholder input on how CMS can continue to expand and strengthen its efforts.

Medicaid is funded jointly by states and the federal government. CMS is required to ensure Medicaid funds are spent lawfully and that states maintain effective systems to detect, prevent, and recover improper payments. When those obligations are not met, CMS has the authority and responsibility to withhold, defer, or disallow federal funds.

In January 2026, CMS notified Minnesota of its intent to withhold federal funds until it was satisfied with the state’s corrective action plan to address its program integrity shortcomings. CMS also notified Minnesota of its intent to conduct a review focused on program integrity to ensure federal funds were not going toward questionable claims.

CMS’ review of Minnesota’s Medicaid spending for the fourth quarter in FY 2025 resulted in a deferral of $259,505,491 in federal matching funds. This includes state expenditures of $243.8 million for unsupported or potentially fraudulent Medicaid claims and $15.4 million related to claims involving individuals lacking a satisfactory immigration status. The agency utilized both traditional financial management approaches and new program integrity oversight strategies to identify unusually high spending and rapid growth in certain service areas, including:

Personal care services;

Home and community-based services; and

Other practitioner services.

CMS is deferring those federal funds to protect taxpayer dollars while ensuring the state has the opportunity to respond and provide information and documentation during the ongoing review. Should Minnesota fail to clean up its significant program integrity vulnerabilities or demonstrate that the expenditures are allowable, CMS may defer more than $1 billion in federal funds over the next year. CMS also continues to intensely oversee Minnesota’s efforts to carry out its corrective action plan to address the underlying causes of fraud, waste, and abuse within the state.

...CMS is taking decisive steps to prevent fraudulent Medicare billing by durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) companies. A six-month moratorium on new Medicare enrollment for certain DMEPOS suppliers builds on CMS’ stopping more than $1.5 billion in suspected fraudulent billing in this area last year.

The DMEPOS supplier enrollment moratorium will allow CMS to explore additional safeguards to further mitigate longstanding instances of fraud, waste, and abuse perpetrated by certain DMEPOS companies. It applies to all applications for initial enrollment and changes in majority ownership for medical supply companies.

CMS also plans to publish information on providers/suppliers whose participation in the Medicare program has been revoked, including their National Provider Identifier and the reason for the revocation. This additional transparency will allow patients and payers, including private insurers, to understand which providers have been subject to such administrative enforcement action by the government.

...CMS is looking to stakeholders to provide input, based on their experience and knowledge, on additional ways the agency can tackle fraud prevention to help inform the development of a possible future rule under CMS’ Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH) initiative.

The CRUSH request for information (RFI) seeks input from a broad range of stakeholders – including states, providers, suppliers, payers, technology companies, patient advocates, beneficiaries, and others – on ways to strengthen CMS’ ability to prevent, detect, and respond to fraud, waste, and abuse, and program inefficiencies in Medicare, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the Health Insurance Marketplace. Stakeholders can provide input on both existing authorities, as well as ideas for new regulatory approaches.

For what it’s worth, over 1.17 MILLION Minnesotan are enrolled in Medicaid, of which:

2 in 5 (43%) are children

2 in 7 (29%) live in a rural area

1 in 7 (14%) have three or more chronic conditions

In Minnesota, Medicaid covers:

34% of all births

32% of all children

16% of all adults age 19 - 64

42% of all working-age adults with disabilities

13% of all Medicare beneficiaries

53% of all nursing home residents

TOTAL Medicaid spending in Minnesota is ~$18.5 BILLION per year, with 64% of that coming from the federal government. This means that Dr. Oz just cut over 14% of Minnesota’s annual Medicaid budget.

For those wondering what “DMEPOS” includes:

Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetic Devices, Prosthetics, Orthotics, & Supplies

Medicare Part B covers medically necessary equipment, devices, and supplies falling under several benefit categories defined under section 1861 of the Social Security Act, commonly referred to as DMEPOS:

DME (such as hospital beds, wheelchairs, ventilators, and oxygen equipment)

Prosthetics and Orthotics (artificial legs, arms, and eyes, and leg, arm, back and neck braces)

Prosthetic Devices (such as ostomy bags, which replace an internal body organ)

Surgical Dressings, and Splints, Casts, and Other Devices used for Reduction of Fractures and Dislocations

Therapeutic Shoes (extra-depth shoes with inserts or custom molded shoes with inserts for an individual with diabetes)

Lymphedema Compression Treatment Items (standard and custom fitted gradient compression garments and other lymphedema compression treatment items).

Most of the DMEPOS items and services listed above are furnished by Medicare-enrolled DMEPOS suppliers, who are responsible for submitting Medicare claims for the items and services to the DME Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). Medicare claims for some of the items and services listed above are processed by other MACs (such as splints, casts, and other items and services furnished by physicians, and items and services furnished by hospital outpatient departments or home health agencies).

All I’ll add for now is that I seeing a lot of “potential,” “suspected” and “questionable” caveats in the press release when it comes to claims of “fraud.”
Top | New | Old
exexec · 70-79, C
And he bragged about cutting SNAP. Our church is trying to help take up some of the slack for those who need food.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
18.5 billion USD for 1.17 million people is nearly 16 kUSD per person per year. That sounds high to me but I haven't been able to find comparable statistics for other countries.

For what it's worth I found this for the UK [1]:
In 2017, the UK spent £2,989 per person on healthcare,
That's about 4 kUSD per person per year.

Even Norway spends less per person [2]
Helseutgifter per innbygger 2023. Kroner: 83 084
That's about 8.7 kUSD

Of course Medicaid only covers a subset of the population and that subset presumably costs more than average.

But even so and even though these events are clearly politically motivated it still seems that Minnesotan health care is not especially financially efficient. Probably because there is such a mishmash of separate organizations involved.

[1] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthcaresystem/articles/howdoesukhealthcarespendingcomparewithothercountries/2019-08-29

[2] https://www.ssb.no/nasjonalregnskap-og-konjunkturer/nasjonalregnskap/statistikk/helseregnskap
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Of course they do.. I assume everyone saw the Republicans all standing and applauding all through that SOTU circus performance..So they are all still with him. Be sure to thank them all come the mid terms..😷
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
That's what happens, when you have a head of state... that doesn't represent the entire state but just his loyalists.

If you don't support him without questions, you are a second rate citizen and will be treated that way.

... or as a NAZI once wrote:

“Every actual democracy rests on the principle that not only are equals equal but unequals will not be treated equally. Democracy requires, therefore, first homogeneity and second—if the need arises elimination or eradication of heterogeneity.”

― Carl Schmitt, Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 In this case,Carl Schmitt was a Nazi - Kwekwoo's accusation is not merely a by-product of the USA's febrile domestic politics in which any names are bandied about ad-lib to suppress thinking.

I looked at two sources: Wikipedia and Stanford University, and both detail in depth (the latter deeper still) his political theories on how a state should function, and his professional activities.

Schmitt was sidelined eventually from the Nazi Party by academic rivals, but maintained his authoritarian beliefs.

Notably, the Wiki. biography says his ideas have influenced China, Russia and the USA - three totally different nations, cultures and political systems but each with a Head of State given the last word.


Whether Schmitt's idea enshrined in that quote has much reality, is another matter. Political-theorists, as Schmitt was, love complicated ideas that other philosophers enjoy, but forget the real world is run by real people, not tidy, ISO-9001-accredited, database-processes.

Consequently, much generalising and tidy-minded ideas that attract would-be autocrats and apply to real ones, but don't always apply everywhere.

That "equals=equals, unequals=0" concept might apply in the USA, probably excites so-called but vaguely-defined "populists" of far-Left and far-Right anywhere, certainly describes autocracies; but most modern democracies do try to treat everyone equally.

Whether any such nations succeeds in equality, or if you like fairness, to a reasonable degree while still liberal in that word's true sense may be debated, but at least they try.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@ArishMell Accusation? My only accusation here, is that the politics comming from the MAGA side, have been Schmittian from the very beginning. Schmitt wrote in favor of an illiberal system, a system were not everyone is equal and those that are "chosen" rule without opposition. His most famous books, press against the weakest points of liberal theory so that it can be undermined by those that want to build a new system.

For MAGA, anyone that isn't a follower is an enemy. And all enemies, are pushed out of the whole that has the potential to rule. Therefore, he says, that equals shall be treated equally... but unequals will be treated accordingly too. MAGA strives for homgeinity, everything they dislike is a threat, and that threat needs to be removed or silenced from the system. These ideas eventually lead to where they always lead... bloodshed. And you can see the manifestations happening already. If someone from the perceived ingroup is murdered, you have a rememberance day at a sports stadium, but if an opposition member gets murdered... well, that's just what these people deserve.

[media=https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kutezrIhhIE]

The right-wing is justified to use violence... they just don't want to see crime. It's diffrent then violence comming from the left-wing. As a head of state, that's quite the statement. Considering that both the left and the right are represented by citizens that he should treat equally AND the state should have a monopoly on violence. But apperently it's okay to give some of that monopoly up to the side that is more equal then the other.

This manifests in so many of his speeches... the unequal treatment overlaps more toppics then just physical violence. It's incredible that democrats even show up for his events like the state of the union. Because none of what this guy says, makes it clear that they are going to get equal protection under the law. As long as this festers, everyone without a red cap on, is cooked. And this will only get worst.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Kwek00 Bravo.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
It looks a bit like "guilty unless proven innocent" - there might be fraudulent claims so cut funding to all rather than determining who if anyone is defrauding whom, to what extent, and going after them.

Only Minnesota though - no other States?
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
Just got on medicare so should be ok.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment