Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The CEO of one of Trump’s favorite companies just made some telling remarks

The head of Peter Thiel’s Palantir Technologies outlined a dystopian vision of the future.


Share this –


Opinion

The CEO of one of Trump’s favorite companies just made some telling remarks
The head of Peter Thiel’s Palantir Technologies outlined a dystopian vision of the future.

Jan. 22, 2026, 3:41 PM EST
By Ryan Teague Beckwith/MSNow

A few decades ago, CEOs were almost intentionally boring, steady hands in gray flannel suits who projected stability.

But starting with the tech boom of the 1990s, they became more eccentric, often self-consciously so. Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg wore gray hoodies to business meetings while Twitter founder Jack Dorsey meditated in a cave in Myanmar and SpaceX’s Elon Musk mused about nuking the Martian ice caps.

So it’s tempting to dismiss the wild-eyed remarks of a corporate leader at the World Economic Forum as just another episode of “CEOs Say the Darnedest Things.”

But it’s worth paying attention to what Palantir Technologies CEO Alex Karp said at Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday because it explains a lot about the underlying ideology that appears to be motivating some of the Trump administration’s actions during the past year.

Palantir is no ordinary company. It does billions of dollars’ worth of work for the federal government, especially the Defense, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security departments, providing software that tracks data on everything from the spread of Ebola to tax evasion to immigration.

It was also founded by Peter Thiel, a billionaire who was a prominent early supporter of Trump’s and spoke at the 2016 Republican convention, and played a key role in the rise of Vice President JD Vance. The New York Times reports that several associates at Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency effort previously worked at Palantir and other companies funded by Thiel.

In a conversation with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Palantir CEO Alex Karp said a few eyebrow-raising things about the future of society under artificial intelligence:

No one really needs to go to college any more. “We’re building batteries for a battery company, and the people who are doing it in America are doing roughly the same job that Japanese engineers are doing, and they went to high school,” he said.

AI will mean there will be enough jobs for everyone to work in their own country, so there will be no need to emigrate. “I do think these trends really do make it hard to imagine why we should have large-scale immigration unless you have a very specialized skill,” he said.

AI will solve racism. Arguing that it “bolsters civil liberties,” Karp suggested a hypothetical scenario in which an AI could be used to see if patients at a hospital were treated differently based on their income or another part of their personal background.

Some of this is to be expected, especially at Davos. AI is to tech CEOs what tariffs are to Trump: a magical tool that will somehow solve every problem and lead to a glorious future, if only everyone else believes hard enough.

But there’s an underlying ideology here that’s worth unpacking. Despite having a degree in philosophy and a Ph.D. in neoclassical social theory from a top German university, Karp doesn’t really see the value in a classic liberal arts education. He argued at Davos that AI “will destroy humanities jobs,” which he talks about as though it were a selling point and not an unfortunate side effect.

The future all of this suggests is one in which high school students train for factory jobs, no one goes to college or immigrates to the U.S. and we all trust black-box software run by major government contractors to determine whether society is being run properly.

Coincidentally or not, this also happens to be the most likely end result of several Trump administration policies.

Trump has attempted to shut down the Department of Education, end student loan forgiveness programs and heavily tax the endowments of private universities, all of which would make it harder for the average high school student to go to college. He’s also instituted travel bans, raised immigration fees, suspended refugee programs and targeted 12 million undocumented immigrants for deportation, reportedly using Palantir software to do so.

To be fair, Trump and Karp arrived at these ideas from different places.

For Trump, ending immigration and somehow bringing back mid-century factory jobs are an attempt to return America to some mythic golden age, while for Karp it’s more about creating a glorious technocratic future. But the overlap here is significant, and helps explain why a lot of Silicon Valley CEOs who otherwise don’t have a lot in common with Trump still support him.

The president doesn’t have much of an ideology, so it’s tempting for his critics to assume that Trumpism, such as it is, will fade away when he leaves office. But remarks like the ones Karp made at Davos show that there are a lot of powerful people out there with ideologies that can lead to a very similar place.

Trumpism may be defeated one day, but Karpism will live on.


Ryan Teague Beckwith is a newsletter editor for MS NOW.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Karpist thoughts may live on. It's up to government to regulate AI so it works in the interests of civil society. And never again to become as enslaved to to the corporate world as Trump has.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl I have the impression that the IT oligarchs want a goverment run on their own, AI-based lines so we could all become very much enslaved.

One point Karp seemed not to realise is that the Japanese, or any other nation's, engineers are not making batteries. I read him as referring to assembly-line workers who do not need more than average school education.

Real engineers are very highly-educated people. In his example they design the batteries and production systems, but you need relatively few of them.

Unless of course he means you'd need no engineers at all. Just someone able simply to tell The Great AI Computer the specifications that will be printed on the finished item's label, and ask it to design the thing to meet those and so that uneducated, unskilled shop-floor staff can assemble it.

Not many of them either because much of the production-line would be automated.


Are there really twelve million "undocumented" illegal immigrants in the USA? How do they know?


I recall Trump's campaigning in 2016 promised reviving dying industries and their style of large-scale employment, and I wondered then if he really understood why they are fading.

One aspect he may have failed to see is that as these trades go, not only do you lose the factories and the mines. You also lose the skills. Former employees have reached retirement - some the eternal sort. Those still young enough for the work forget their former knowledge as they find alternative work. Also, however, willing to work, fewer young people are likely to want those old, hard, unpleasant, monotonous, even dangerous ways to earn a living.

We all still need the products, and the most important metallic element we have is Iron for itself and for steel; but making them is not a nice way to make a living even with modern methods.

While manufacturing cars no longer need a few hundred living automatons each fitting his allotted component every five minutes. Modern car plants use far fewer staff for the same , or higher, output.

...

As for AI, only time wil tell but once invented it stays, and it will need very, very careful and determined planning to control it so it benefits everyone as a tool, not merely keeps a few oligarchs rich.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@ArishMell It needs to be very carefully regulated and marshalled by government. It can't be left to the free market or millions will suffer. I think recent government intervention in social media marks an critically important change in direction.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl Well, let's hope it happens or we will all be run by the IT companies....

The social-media owners bleat about these controls but they, as publishers although trying to deny that, don't have the courage to ask why they are becoming necessary
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl Sorry. I dont believe "Government" will do that. Karp has the money..😷
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@ArishMell There have been some positive push-backs recently, in Australia with the social media ban for children, in the UK with the Digital Services Act and staring down Musk over his failure to prevent illegal pornography.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl Some years ago our local paper ran a feature on how the county police is helping fight on-line crime.

The senior officer interviewed explained that illegal pornography (mainly paedophilic) is really a small part of the Internet-based crime. Although that is certainly totally wrong and perhaps the nastiest, the bulk of the crime is financial - frauds, money-laundering, direct theft from accounts, etc.

I wonder how it compares now... having reported and deleted six attacks only an hour ago. (Each came from its own user and domain names but the "View Source" tool revealed four had the same origin.)

Most of those offences do not use social-media though, apart from the wicked dating scams. They work through e-mails instead.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@ArishMell Child porn is more self-regulating than most online crimes in that most people are disgusted by it and the fear of public exposure and personal ruin appears to be an effective deterrent for most. Musk is vile because he uses the smokescreen of freedom.of speech to blur the edges around age, consent, and personal dignity. Before you know it we will be back in the 1970s when the enjoyment of adults is prioritised over the safety of children.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl I must admit I'd not thought of it that way, so much as these dark desires being relatively rare among fetishes. I agree with the deterrence factor though. Though it's not only paedophilia that publishers like Elon Musk do not try enough to wipe out.

It's also cruel peer-to-peer bullying, suicide and self-injury encouragement, false and harmful medical claims and fads, anonymous attempts to crush constructive discussion of difficult social matters or political-party differences.

It's also these publishers' deliberate policy to make their sites addictive, and to influence users' selections of contents to minimise seeing alternatives.

Their claim not to be publishers is hardly credible.

One point though that seems not mentioned enough, about worrying about children withering their lives away on-line, is, well, who are these children's exemplars, but so many of the grown-ups around them? Even their own parents. So many grown-ups seem they really really must spend the whole bus or train journey, cafe meal, walk along the High Street, shopping, even in social circles,... going tap-tap-tap-scroll-scroll-scroll on their little talking blocks. Even the professional wafflers on radio, TV, in the papers, love to tell us "now we all"... do just that. So we can't blame the children completely.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@ArishMell I don't blame children at all. They pick up bad habits from the older generation. Most children desire nothing more than quality time from an attentive adult.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl I agree - a sort of unwitting neglect, even. Being given mere cartoons to watch on a 'phone is hardly "quality" of time, attention or indeed material.