This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
4meAndyou · F
I watched a television interview on this very subject this morning. The man interviewed was a Republican member of the Minnesota state congress.
He said that Tim Walz is basically attempting to declare war on Trump, threatening to call out the Minnesota National Guard to combat ICE.
He also mentioned that the Minnesota state prosecutor is guilty of concealing exculpatory evidence in the case of the ICE officer who shot and killed the anti-ICE activist who tried to ram him and hit his partner with her car.
His thoughts on the matter were that LEADERS in Minnesota are encouraging protests.
There are also very large anti-ICE activist groups in the state. The woman who was shot and killed after trying to RAM ICE agents with her car was a member of one of those groups.
He said that Tim Walz is basically attempting to declare war on Trump, threatening to call out the Minnesota National Guard to combat ICE.
He also mentioned that the Minnesota state prosecutor is guilty of concealing exculpatory evidence in the case of the ICE officer who shot and killed the anti-ICE activist who tried to ram him and hit his partner with her car.
His thoughts on the matter were that LEADERS in Minnesota are encouraging protests.
There are also very large anti-ICE activist groups in the state. The woman who was shot and killed after trying to RAM ICE agents with her car was a member of one of those groups.
4meAndyou · F
@Heartlander No. This is how Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Progressives behave. IF...big IF...Walz sets his National Guard against ICE, Trump will call on his powers under the Insurrection Act...and since he is commander in CHIEF...it is within his power to force Minnesotan National Guard to stand down.
@4meAndyou But didn't we just see a half dozens high profile Democrats announce that members of the armed forces had the right to refuse to follow orders issued by the president or the war department?
Yes, there was the qualifier about it being an illegal order, but who decides what's a legal or illegal order? Ahhh ... the courts and 677 federal district judges, judges with political leanings.
Yes, there was the qualifier about it being an illegal order, but who decides what's a legal or illegal order? Ahhh ... the courts and 677 federal district judges, judges with political leanings.
4meAndyou · F
@Heartlander
If you believe what desperate-grasping-at-straws Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Progressives say, then you MIGHT also believe that Biden was in his right mind. And I know you are a lot smarter than that.
The problem with Politicians trying to convince members of our armed forces that they don't need to obey their orders unless they make sure, first, they are LEGAL is that almost EVERYONE who is NOT in the armed forces is confused...so...
... tell me how an 18 year old member of the National Guard is supposed to become a Constitutional lawyer instantly? Not going to happen.
ALL members of the military are trained to obey their orders, instantly, in faith that their commanding officers would NOT issue an order that was illegal.
That a-hole Mark Kelly is in a world of sh!t for even suggesting that our military should question their orders.
Now...if your commanding officer tells you to shoot and innocent little baby...I think anyone would know instantly that is an illegal order. A soldier would certainly hesitate. Even then...what if your commanding officer KNOWS that the baby has been infected with a deadly virus in order to kill our troops?
Our military are VERY well trained. The chain of command is drilled into every part of our military...and all orders MUST be assumed to be legal.
AND orders from the President of the United States of America, the Commander in Chief, are NOT given unless they are first examined and legally vetted by his team.
Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Progressive AHOLE judges might ATTEMPT to throw a spoke in his wheel...but they will always, always, always be defeated.
If you believe what desperate-grasping-at-straws Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Progressives say, then you MIGHT also believe that Biden was in his right mind. And I know you are a lot smarter than that.
The problem with Politicians trying to convince members of our armed forces that they don't need to obey their orders unless they make sure, first, they are LEGAL is that almost EVERYONE who is NOT in the armed forces is confused...so...
... tell me how an 18 year old member of the National Guard is supposed to become a Constitutional lawyer instantly? Not going to happen.
ALL members of the military are trained to obey their orders, instantly, in faith that their commanding officers would NOT issue an order that was illegal.
That a-hole Mark Kelly is in a world of sh!t for even suggesting that our military should question their orders.
Now...if your commanding officer tells you to shoot and innocent little baby...I think anyone would know instantly that is an illegal order. A soldier would certainly hesitate. Even then...what if your commanding officer KNOWS that the baby has been infected with a deadly virus in order to kill our troops?
Our military are VERY well trained. The chain of command is drilled into every part of our military...and all orders MUST be assumed to be legal.
AND orders from the President of the United States of America, the Commander in Chief, are NOT given unless they are first examined and legally vetted by his team.
Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Progressive AHOLE judges might ATTEMPT to throw a spoke in his wheel...but they will always, always, always be defeated.




