Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Mike Johnson Accidentally Lets Slip Why He Won’t Fund Food Stamps

Mike Johnson accidentally gave away his whole game.

By Edith Olmsted/The New Republic
October 30, 2025
3:57 p.m. ET

House Speaker Mike Johnson admitted Thursday that feeding the hungry would mess up his political game.

CNN host Dana Bash asked Johnson why he wouldn’t consider moving money around to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which will stop receiving federal funds at the start of November. The House speaker accidentally revealed Republicans are using the program as leverage to end the government shutdown.

“Because if you deviate from the goal of reopening the entire government, Chuck Schumer and the radicals over there will continue to play games with people’s paychecks, their livelihoods,” Johnson said. “And if you do just part of this, it will reduce pressure for them to do all of it, to do their basic job, and that is reopen the government.”

It seems clear that Democrats aren’t the ones playing games with people’s livelihoods, but instead it is Republicans who are holding SNAP benefits hostage from 42 million Americans in order to make the opposition bend. And SNAP is a hostage Republicans are more than willing to kill—they’ve already voted to gut nearly $300 billion from the program through 2034.

Earlier Thursday, Johnson claimed that President Donald Trump had already done everything he could to mitigate the harm. But in fact, the Trump administration turned back on its own policy by claiming without precedent that it cannot legally use SNAP contingency funds to keep the essential program afloat during a government shutdown.

Instead, the Trump administration has set up a false dilemma, asserting that the government can’t continue to fund SNAP benefits without draining funds from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants and Children, or WIC, which is currently being paid for by tariff money. Meanwhile, Trump had no problem moving funds to pay for military service members’ paychecks.
Top | New | Old
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 Loved those J6 pardons, right?
Lived that pardon Trump gave the drug lord?
Love how Trump's pardons crooks?
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@JSul3 I love how Biden pardoned his son after he swore he wouldn’t and his family and the J6 committee and fauci, you don’t pardon people that are innocent. How many criminals sis Biden pardon? How many did oblamo pardon? A hell of a lot more than Trump, the J6’s deserved a pardon, they were not allowed their due process of a timely trial or even allowed bail and were kept in unsanitary conditions
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 J6 were convicted by their peers in a court of law.

While I don't agree with all of Biden's pardons, he did it ...but none of them were trying to overthrow our government.

Every Republican could have testified at the hearings about J6, including your Orange Messiah Felon Trump. In fact, go look at those who did testify and you will find 99.9% were Republicans.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
are you certain?

I mean, are you Imprint certain??
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Billions to bail out speculators in Argentine bonds and nothing for food assistance or health insurance subsidies.

As expected for Republicans.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 Ok....so tell me why Trump supporters are going ballistic about losing their healthcare subsidies?
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@JSul3 I don’t know any that are, if they are they’re going ballistic about Schumer and democrats voting no to a clean CR one that they just voted yes to just a few months ago , tell me why they are voting against their constituents best interests
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 Get off Fox News Pat.

Folks in Red States want their healthcare subsidies and SNAP benefits.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
Mike Johnson, and all Trumps collaborators are deeply ill intentioned toward the American people. Lawrence O'Donnell called them "sadistic zombies", an apt name.

Trump and his allies cannot be reformed. They have to be overthrown, driven out of power and retribution delivered.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
@badminton And once convicted jail them. Eff you Merrick Garland. Jail convicted felons.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@jshm2 the high death rates guarantee that this population that refuses to feed and house itself will be permanently solved!
trollslayer · 46-50, M
How long before his Grindr profile is revealed?
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
Answer me this, why are dummycrats still voting no to opening the government when EVERY REPUBLICAN has voted yes ?
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 Keep telling yourself that, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@JSul3 the rich pay 99.5 % of the taxes, I’ll bet you get a refund, if you do then you don’t pay your fair share of taxes anyone that gets a refund doesn’t pay their fair share
JSul3 · 70-79
@Prison1203 LOL!

I urge you to go back and read the history of what rich people paid in taxes.

In the United States, the top marginal income tax rate for the wealthiest individuals exceeded 50% for several decades, primarily from 1932 to 1986.
Key periods when the top marginal rate was over 50% include:
1930s-1940s (Great Depression and WWII): The top rate was increased to 63% in 1932 and then steadily climbed, reaching its historical peak of 94% in 1944 and 1945.
1945-1963 (Post-WWII era): The top rate remained exceptionally high, mostly at 91%.
1964-1981: The rate was lowered to 77% in 1964, and then stabilized at 70% from 1965 until 1981.
1982-1986: As a result of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, the top rate was reduced to 50%, where it remained until the Tax Reform Act of 1986 lowered it further.
It is important to note that the marginal tax rate applies only to income that falls within the highest tax bracket, and due to various deductions and loopholes available at the time, the effective tax rate (the actual percentage of total income paid in taxes) for the very rich was often lower than the statutory marginal rate. However, the effective tax rates were still generally higher in the mid-20th century than they are today.

The highest top marginal federal income tax rate in U.S. history was 94% during World War II, specifically for the tax years 1944 and 1945. This rate applied to taxable income over $200,000 (which is equivalent to over $3 million in today's dollars).
Following the war, the top marginal rate remained high, generally at least 91% until the early 1960s, and then at 70% until 1981. The current top marginal federal income tax rate is 37%.

Do you see a trend here Pat?


We have a select few that have the vast majority of wealth in this country. The wage gap between rich and poor continues to widen.
Americans deserve the current results, even if most of them refuse to admit it's killing them off. Good riddance.

 
Post Comment