Trump Judge will have no choice but to issue a directed verdict acquitting Trump
At the most Bragg and crew may create some murky water getting nowhere near creating mud. The defense team won’t need to put on a case 😂😂😂
61-69, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
View 36 more replies »
Manneeds · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson the way the demosewerrat demowrecker demoliberial demophyscopath demomental case demoredart democraps destructing trump will get elected
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It’s appearing that way however not a good idea to take the foot off the gas until Inauguration Day. I do t not trust the dems. @Manneeds
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
Dream on!!
Let's start with the first major witness against Trump. David Pecker's company, American Media Inc, made a deal in 2018 to avoid federal prosecution, acknowledging that it had illegally tried to influence the election in favor of Trump by the manner in which it tried to protect Trump from news about his affair with a former Playboy nude model.
Who's the other major witness? Cohen. Yeah, Cohen lied under oath and went to jail. Key point here, Cohen lied to protect Trump. Cohen was convicted in part for unlawfully violating campaign finance laws to interfere in the election, and went to prison for that crime.
In other words, @jackjjackson, Trump's co-conspirators are already known to be guilty for the some of the felonies Trump is accused of. Can Trump separate himself from his already guilty co-conspirators! Smart money says NO!!!
Let's start with the first major witness against Trump. David Pecker's company, American Media Inc, made a deal in 2018 to avoid federal prosecution, acknowledging that it had illegally tried to influence the election in favor of Trump by the manner in which it tried to protect Trump from news about his affair with a former Playboy nude model.
Who's the other major witness? Cohen. Yeah, Cohen lied under oath and went to jail. Key point here, Cohen lied to protect Trump. Cohen was convicted in part for unlawfully violating campaign finance laws to interfere in the election, and went to prison for that crime.
In other words, @jackjjackson, Trump's co-conspirators are already known to be guilty for the some of the felonies Trump is accused of. Can Trump separate himself from his already guilty co-conspirators! Smart money says NO!!!
ElwoodBlues · M
@jackjjackson You can't even count,[b] LOL!!![/b]
More spoon-feeding, [b]ROTFL!!![/b]
[quote]In his filing, Bragg sets out four potential object offenses: violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152; violations of federal, local, and state tax law; and additional falsifications of business records outside the Trump Organization. Merchan allowed Bragg to move forward with the first three theories but tossed out the last one. [/quote]
Wow, only sunstroke needs more spoon feeding than you, [b]ROTFL!!![/b]
More spoon-feeding, [b]ROTFL!!![/b]
[quote]In his filing, Bragg sets out four potential object offenses: violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152; violations of federal, local, and state tax law; and additional falsifications of business records outside the Trump Organization. Merchan allowed Bragg to move forward with the first three theories but tossed out the last one. [/quote]
Wow, only sunstroke needs more spoon feeding than you, [b]ROTFL!!![/b]
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
@jackjjackson If you were to read the following carefully, it would clear up all your misconceptions.
[quote]If you’re looking for the clearest statement of Bragg’s legal theory, you can find it in a November 2023 court filing opposing Trump’s motion to dismiss the case, along with Merchan’s ruling on that motion. Notably, in that ruling, Merchan clarified that § 175.10 “does not require that the ‘other crime’ actually be committed”—“all that is required is that defendant … acted with a conscious aim and objective to commit another crime.”
In his filing, Bragg sets out four potential object offenses: violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152; violations of federal, local, and state tax law; and additional falsifications of business records outside the Trump Organization. Merchan allowed Bragg to move forward with the first three theories but tossed out the last one.
. . .
The potential tax fraud arises from the particular method by which the Trump Organization reimbursed Cohen for his payments to Daniels. Bragg alleges that “defendant reimbursed Cohen twice the amount he was owed for the payoff so Cohen could characterize the payments as income on his tax returns and still be left whole after paying approximately 50% in income taxes.” Here, Bragg points to federal, state, and local prohibitions on providing knowingly incorrect tax information. [/quote]
[b]https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/charting-the-legal-theory-behind-people-v.-trump[/b]
[quote]If you’re looking for the clearest statement of Bragg’s legal theory, you can find it in a November 2023 court filing opposing Trump’s motion to dismiss the case, along with Merchan’s ruling on that motion. Notably, in that ruling, Merchan clarified that § 175.10 “does not require that the ‘other crime’ actually be committed”—“all that is required is that defendant … acted with a conscious aim and objective to commit another crime.”
In his filing, Bragg sets out four potential object offenses: violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152; violations of federal, local, and state tax law; and additional falsifications of business records outside the Trump Organization. Merchan allowed Bragg to move forward with the first three theories but tossed out the last one.
. . .
The potential tax fraud arises from the particular method by which the Trump Organization reimbursed Cohen for his payments to Daniels. Bragg alleges that “defendant reimbursed Cohen twice the amount he was owed for the payoff so Cohen could characterize the payments as income on his tax returns and still be left whole after paying approximately 50% in income taxes.” Here, Bragg points to federal, state, and local prohibitions on providing knowingly incorrect tax information. [/quote]
[b]https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/charting-the-legal-theory-behind-people-v.-trump[/b]
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
LeopoldBloom · M
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Better choice to bury. @Paladin
LeopoldBloom · M
@jackjjackson Anytime after his second term.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Don’t know the corporal. Your Dad? @LeopoldBloom
LeopoldBloom · M
@jackjjackson Excuse me, I meant Cadet Bonespurs. He was promoted.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
You’d know since we are discussing your Dad @LeopoldBloom
Aidankenny23 · M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment