Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of Covid-19 Pandemic, Energy Department Now Says

[b]So Glad It's In Time To Make A Difference...............[/b]

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak, according to a classified intelligence report recently provided to the White House and key members of Congress.

The shift by the Energy Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines’s office.

[b]David Relman, a Stanford University microbiologist who has argued for a dispassionate investigation into the pandemic’s beginnings, welcomed word of the updated findings.

“Kudos to those who are willing to set aside their preconceptions and objectively re-examine what we know and don’t know about Covid origins,” said Dr. Relman, who has served on several federal scientific-advisory boards. “My plea is that we not accept an incomplete answer or give up because of political expediency.”[/b]

Some scientists argue that the virus probably emerged naturally and leapt from an animal to a human, the same pathway for outbreaks of previously unknown pathogens.

Yet no confirmed animal source for Covid-19 has been identified. The lack of an animal source, and the fact that Wuhan is the center of China’s extensive coronavirus research, has led some scientists and U.S. officials to argue that a lab leak is the best explanation for the pandemic’s beginning.

[b]U.S. State Department cables written in 2018 and internal Chinese documents show that there were persistent concerns about China’s biosafety procedures, which have been cited by proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis.[/b]

[b]Wuhan is home to an array of laboratories, many of which were built or expanded as a result of China’s traumatic experience with the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, epidemic beginning in 2002.[/b] They include campuses of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products, which produces vaccines.

The new report highlights how different parts of the intelligence community have arrived at disparate judgments about the pandemic’s origin. The Energy Department now joins the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory. Four other agencies, along with a national intelligence panel, still judge that it was likely the result of a natural transmission, and two are undecided.

The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.

The Energy Department made its judgment with “low confidence,” according to people who have read the classified report.

The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with “moderate confidence” and still holds to this view.

The FBI employs a cadre of microbiologists, immunologists and other scientists and is supported by the National Bioforensic Analysis Center, which was established at Fort Detrick, Md., in 2004 to analyze anthrax and other possible biological threats.

U[b].S. officials declined to give details on the fresh intelligence and analysis that led the Energy Department to change its position. They added that while the Energy Department and the FBI each say an unintended lab leak is most likely, they arrived at those conclusions for different reasons.[/b]



https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Ontheroad · M
For a little context:

The FBI believes the theory with [b]"moderate confidence,"[/b] and the DOE holds[b] "low confidence,[/b]" while the National Intelligence Council supports the [b]natural animal-to-human transmission origin[/b] theory. Other agencies, including the CIA, [b]remain undecided[/b]. The Wuhan lab has been scrutinized since the pandemic began, particularly over concerns about loose safety protocols and U.S.-funded "gain of function" research.

I'm still at the I don't know, so I'm not pointing fingers stage.
RuyLopez · 56-60, M
@Ontheroad The article does list the varying confidence levels from the DOE, FBI, and other agencies. Honestly, if they can't figure this out by now without at least moderate level of certainty they are just more worried about CYA. That is why I think they were reticent to stick their necks out in during the pandemic or worse just outright complicit. There was not any push back when Fauci and others were so certain if was from natural transmission from animals to humans via bats in the Wuhan wet markets.
Ontheroad · M
@RuyLopez Just more crap for the media to put out there on slow news days. Personally, I don't believe any of them... other than the ones who aren't stating they aren't sure.