Journalists don't want to cover Paul Pelosi attack because...

It might ruin their careers!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/it-can-ruin-your-career-glenn-greenwald-explains-why-journalists-are-terrified-to-question-paul-pelosi-narrative?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Heartlander · 80-89, M

It's as if there is a coordinated effort to craft the details of the alleged assault to serve a political purpose.

In the first official press conference I saw, the police spokesperson said it was Paul Pelosi's hammer and that he used it to confront the intruder, and he and the intruder at some point had a struggled over the hammer. Now there is no information about who did what and when. It's as if there is a Hollywood script writer creating a tale based on an actual event.

4meAndyou · F

@Heartlander Sort of like January 6th, huh?

Heartlander · 80-89, M

@4meAndyou How long did the police hide the detail's of Paul's DWI arrest from the public?

This is sounding more and more like the Obama administration's rendering of the bin Laden raid. The one where they lost the video feed just before someone killed bin Laden. I wonder; the technician that connected all the wires for the bin Laden video? Was he/she the same person that connected the cameras that were used to watch Jeff Epstein?

Today's news says that it was Pelosi's hammer. Does that mean that the intruder was unarmed? Also that Pelosi had gone to a bedroom to call the police and Pelosi wasn't struck until after the police arrived. If Pelosi was the one with the hammer when he went to the bedroom to call the police, why wouldn't he just shut the door until the police arrived?

4meAndyou · F

@Heartlander No idea what the truth is, here, because the only thing we can trust the Pelosis to do is lie and cover their a$$es, and the media who are in bed with them are exactly the same.