Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should Christina Bobb be held accountable?

We've been hearing that she attested to the fact that Trump had returned all pertinent documents, but now we're focusing on CYA language she added:


"based upon the information that has been provided to me."

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawyers-2658420858/

I'm sort of thinking, based on this, that there's not much to hold her accountable for legally, despite the moral and ethical problems with representing a criminal client.

Did she satisfy her ethical duty of candor towards the tribunal?

I'd say she did, if this language was included, and she didn't make any further representations about her inquiry.

I'm not a fan, but this stuff makes me think she tried to do her job, while not violating her professional obligations.

And, I also think, that those attacking her for representing Trump should have picked up on this a long time ago.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawyers-2658420858/
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
That phrase is her "get out of jail" card, she hopes.. But she did sign as an officer of the court and the legal sanctions on her for lack of due diligence should apply..😷
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
That phrase is her "get out of jail" card, she hopes.

Yeah, well, it didn't work for this guy: