Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hillary went 11 hours and didn't take the 5th.

Do you think that was because in every investigation the Republicans already knew she had nothing to do with what happened in Benghazi? They hardly even prepared questions. The investigations were just to keep the story in the Media or at least on Fox every day. The conclusions of these investigations were never discussed on Fox.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
And guess who was not under oath during that 11 hours?
room101 · 51-55, M
@sunsporter1649 And guess who has never had to face anything like such grilling. Every damned Republican that's who.
@sunsporter1649 The congress members doing the questioning were not under oath during the 11 hours.

All witnesses for house & senate committees are sworn. ALL. Check your source; you've got it wrong AGAIN!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues "Although Clinton’s January testimony in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee may have misled Congress and the public, it was not apparently offered under oath and is therefore cannot be considered perjury. Aides from both chambers confirmed that “We checked with the committee and she [Clinton] wasn’t sworn in.”
@sunsporter1649 Source??

Here's the thing dude. Hilllary's 11 hour ordeal was on OCTOBER 22, 2015. Your quote refers to JANUARY. Your quote is NOT describing the eleven hours we've all been talking about. Very misleading; glad I caught it!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues "According to CNBC, The judge ordered Clinton to testify at a deposition for a lawsuit related to her use of a private email server for involving official business while working as secretary of State under President Barack Obama.

Judge Royce Lamberth says, “It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.”

The trial is for the alleged email scandal in her involvement in Benghazi. Court case was held virtually so she did not have to testify under oath."
@sunsporter1649 Yeah, keep shoveling.
Your new quote makes perfectly clear that it's NOT referring to Hillary Clinton's 11 hours of testimony before a congressional committee, it's referring to a completely different kind of event.

Hillary WAS under oath for ELEVEN HOURS in front of a republican controlled congressional committee on Oct 22, 2015. Just like I told you! And Hillary didn't take the 5th even ONCE! In comparison, Trump took the 5th 440 times in his four hours of sworn 'testimony' about his corporations.
@ElwoodBlues He just regurgitates the shit he sees on Fox. He never has any real information. Just dumb memes and he doesn't even understand them half the time.
@Pitchblue Trump is a fucking nightmare and was most likely selling nuclear secrets. People like Sporty have been brainwashed to spew Republican Propaganda. If they say Treason you say Hunter's Laptop. If they say Trump made stiffer laws about stealing US Documents, you say Hillary's e mails. If they say, Trade Nuclear Secrets, you say Biden fell off his Bike.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pitchblue If the Federal Bureau of Investigation is going to be roving the countryside looking for presidential documents, then Barack Obama’s residence must be next. By now, you all know about the federal raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, executed under the pretense of document retrieval. The FBI deployed many agents to find documents for the National Archives. The political class doesn’t want Trump to run again, and they used their allies at the Department of Justice to deliver that warning. Agents broke into the safe, manhandled Melania Trump’s clothing, and absconded with boxes of supposed documents meant for preservation, but reportedly barred Trump’s lawyers from overseeing the search.

All of this over some reported missing records—it’s just waggish that the feds would think we, the American people, would buy this narrative. I don’t think even the staunchest Trump hater even believes this line, with their main criticism being just that—the cover story isn’t plausible. It’s not, but let’s have some fun with this game. If federal agents are roving nationwide to ensure the National Archives is content, then Obama’s house must be ransacked next because the issue tracking all his documents stems back to 2018. Troves of Obama files went missing—vanished into the ether. Real Clear Politics around this time reported on the lost files, with Hillary Clinton’s email fiasco via her private homebrew server again being mentioned (via RCP):

In the middle of directing the difficult task of transferring the historically important records of the Obama administration into the National Archives, the archivist in charge, David Ferriero, ran into a serious problem: A lot of key records are missing.

A first-rate librarian, Ferriero has been driving a much-needed digital overhaul and expansion of the National Archives over the nine years of his appointment. This will greatly improve the ability of digital search locally and remotely, as well as accessing the files themselves.

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”
@sunsporter1649 I notice you're omitting the key word "classified." Why is that?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues LOL, just who decides what is classified and what is not?
Carla · 61-69, F
@sunsporter1649 copy and paste and memes.
Sporto, you really haven't a brain, have you?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Carla · 61-69, F
@sunsporter1649 you and slade continue to verify my points.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Carla Found those 33,000 cupcake recipes yet? Murdered any more border agents with firearms you sold to the mexican gangs? Discovered where hunters laptop got off too after it was given to the fbir? How's that wall around sippy-cups mansion on the beach coming along?
@Carla It's so transparent.