Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I am curious. Why is the so-called vaccine dangerous? It’s not a vaccine. It’s a type of immunotherapy that doesn’t work as advertised.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
I think the general consensus is that if the vaccine is so bad at its primary function, preventing the spread of Covid 19, what other problems or concerns are there undiscovered or covered up?

At this point I will take my chances with Covid.
@SumKindaMunster The vaccine is an absolute, 100% failure. It's been the exact opposite of everything "the health experts" said it would be and do. There were some immunologists who warned us that vaccinating the public into a pandemic was potentially suicidal, as it would lead to mutating escape variants. Of course, they were silenced. Now we are three years into this thing and it's still going.
@SumKindaMunster Actually, the general consensus among immunologists, virologists and immunologists is the vaccine was highly effective against the alpha, beta, and delta waves.

As far as the spread of Covid, if only 60% of republicans are getting vaccinated, it's hard to blame the vaccine for a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

According to the polls, Trump supporters were much less likely to take the vaccine than Biden supporters. Does this difference show up in county case & death rates? Indeed it does!




[sep][sep][center]UPDATE[/center][sep][sep]

@SumKindaMunster can't refute any of my facts, so he attempts to make personal attacks instead. [b]SAD!![/b]
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues https://www.autism.org/autism-symptoms-and-diagnosis-in-adults/

[quote]Social difficulties include issues with communication and understanding, which sometimes makes the ordinary exchange process of social conversation difficult[/quote]

[quote]Repetitive behaviors include restricted schedules and activities, strict layouts and consistency of surrounding environments, and intense interests or obsessions. [/quote]

[quote]Adults on the spectrum may experience challenges with complex planning and thinking, making it difficult to see “big-picture” ideas into which their intense subjects of focus fit. [/quote]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
You’re going to confuse him with facts. @SumKindaMunster
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@jackjjackson Am I wrong? This guy's totally on the spectrum, correct?
@SumKindaMunster Is this your way of changing the subject to a personal attack because you can't refute the overwhelming torrent of data proving the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine?

Dude, personal attacks don't refute data, they just make you look silly!
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues We're not having a discussion Peckerwood. So there is no subject to change. I don't even read what you write anymore, it's the same thing over and over, sometimes quite literally.
@SumKindaMunster You can ignore the facts, but you can't change them.

Actually, the general consensus among immunologists, virologists and immunologists is the vaccine was highly effective against the alpha, beta, and delta waves.

As far as the spread of Covid, if only 60% of republicans are getting vaccinated, it's hard to blame the vaccine for a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

According to the polls, Trump supporters were much less likely to take the vaccine than Biden supporters. Does this difference show up in county case & death rates? Indeed it does!



SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues Case in point ☝️
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@ElwoodBlues Look at these pro-covid nutters run! You’d think they’d have the decency to at least address the evidence before disappearing, but no... they can’t get to the exit fast enough.

Pathetic misanthropes!
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 Nobody's running dumbass. Peckerwood is on the spectrum, we've all addressed these things with him many times. In case you haven't noticed, he basically just posts the same replies over and over. It gets old.

Why don't you either make a comment on this thread expressing your opinion on the matter, or scurry back to your little island and propaganda bubble.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@SumKindaMunster You haven’t addressed even a single ‘thing’ on any of his posts here.

The stuff he posts is reality and fact... how is that meant to change (except in your world, I suppose)?

If you have the ability to rebut the facts are presented, then do so.

But we all know that in fact you’ll just scurry further down the rabbit hole.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 I've already explained to you that I've addressed his posts in the past and am not repeating the effort.

I'm sorry you missed that detail or were too stubborn to acknowledge it.

Anything else?
@SumKindaMunster [quote]I've already explained to you that I've addressed his posts [/quote] Yeah, but in any rational sense, that's flat out false. You "address my posts" by ignoring the data, making personal attacks, and/or attempting to diagnose me. That's just risible.

[quote]I'm sorry you missed that detail or were too stubborn to acknowledge it. [/quote] Little bit of [i]projection[/i] there??
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues Oh bullshit I spoke to you as a person and offered my honest opinions and beliefs.

You aren't interested in discussing anything, you want to post the same shit over and over and over and over and demand everyone go through it and figure out where you are wrong.

I'm not doing that. Doesn't appear anyone else is interested either.

@SumKindaMunster Yes, you offered your opinion and beliefs. however, you've offered no data nor source of data to refute the geographic data I cited here and the conclusions I draw from it.

There's a lot of misinformation that I don't care about; people can talk about their "essential oils" and their astrological bull and I don't care. But some misinformation is DANGEROUS, and I take a stand against dangerous public health misinformation, such as steering people away from proven effective treatments.

How do I know your public health claims are dangerous? I don't know for sure until I've seen the data those claims are based on. And you, like all the other anti-vaxxers here, won't or can't present your foundational public health data. Don't be like the guy with the carrot in the cartoon - holding one misunderstood factoid above reams of public health data.

And your latest ploy here "oh I explained it all elsewhere" is just another effort to dodge the question of where's the data.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SumKindaMunster Yep, still no data, still no counter argument, still no refutation. In fact, no attempt to engage with the facts at all.

Face it dude, you are a spreader of DANGEROUS misinformation.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues Uh huh. Anything else? You wanna start with the last word nonsense again too?
@SumKindaMunster Face it dude, you are a spreader of DANGEROUS misinformation.

Because the general consensus among immunologists, virologists and immunologists is the vaccine was [i]highly[/i] effective against the alpha, beta, and delta waves.

As far as the spread of Covid is concerned, if only 60% of republicans are getting vaccinated, it's hard to blame the vaccine for a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

According to the polls, Trump supporters were much less likely to take the vaccine than Biden supporters. Does this difference show up in county infection & death rates? Indeed it does!



@SumKindaMunster Agreed. I blocked this dope a long time ago. He’s good at regurgitating MSM and woke bs. But beyond that? Another cellar dweller best blocked and forgotten.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
He does put out a high volume of “ work product” 😂 @stratosranger