Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should we have listened to Patton?

“I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof — that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but [b]we have failed in the liberation of Europe[/b]; we have lost the war!”

George S. Patton
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The American public would not have supported that.
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@LeopoldBloom Certainly Hollywood and the media would not have supported it. They were mainly sympathizers. Reagan eventually discovered that.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Some of us today would. @LeopoldBloom
Justme22 · M
@irishmolly72 So glad you are reading your HUAC committee minutes.
@irishmolly72 What a bunch of BS. Everyone was tired of the war by then.

Reagan was a senile idiot, by the way. The decline of the US started under him.
@jackjjackson It’s easy to theorize from your armchair 75 years later. Please feel free to go to Ukraine right now if you want to fight the Russians so badly. Typical loudmouth coward.