This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Tectonic plates that cause earthquakes have absolutely nothing to do with the ionosphere. It's simply impossible that anything that far up could. The mass itself of any given tectonic plate is far too great by at minimum quadrillions of times.
You're like saying you could move a whole continent all by your own self. Or any group of people could do so by themselves.
You're like saying you could move a whole continent all by your own self. Or any group of people could do so by themselves.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@DeWayfarer superheat a fault line causing vibrations and see what happens
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@cherokeepatti yet that is not in the ionosphere!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere
[quote]The ionosphere (/aɪˈɒnəˌsfɪər/)[1][2] is the ionized part of the upper atmosphere of Earth, from about 48km (30mi) to 965km (600mi) above sea level,[3] a region that includes the thermosphere and parts of the mesosphere and exosphere. The ionosphere is ionized by solar radiation. [/quote]
It would have to at least be pointed in the opposite direction! 🤷🏻♂️
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere
[quote]The ionosphere (/aɪˈɒnəˌsfɪər/)[1][2] is the ionized part of the upper atmosphere of Earth, from about 48km (30mi) to 965km (600mi) above sea level,[3] a region that includes the thermosphere and parts of the mesosphere and exosphere. The ionosphere is ionized by solar radiation. [/quote]
It would have to at least be pointed in the opposite direction! 🤷🏻♂️
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@DeWayfarer I will believe a physicist over some random person here. Was told over 30 years ago that there was technology to trigger earthquakes
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@cherokeepatti what I stated...that's common sense! Water just doesn't pour upwards either.
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@cherokeepatti [quote]I will believe a physicist over some random person here.[/quote]
Does this physicist also advocate that we destroy all radio transmitters on the planet? because that's basically what haarp is, a high powered radio transmitter
Does this physicist also advocate that we destroy all radio transmitters on the planet? because that's basically what haarp is, a high powered radio transmitter
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@cherokeepatti [quote]superheat a fault line causing vibrations and see what happens[/quote]
Haarp operates at a frequency range of 2.7 to 10 MHz. It requires targeted, focused, powerful ultrasonic frequencies to even begin heat something as dense as rock in close proximity (ultrasonic is 20+MHz), You'd need something in the high gigahertz or even terahertz range (thousands of times more powerful than any current transmitter) to melt rock at distance.
Of course, it you want to ignore actual physics and common sense, your 5G cell phone (24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz) is more likely to cause an earthquake than haarp... 🤣
Haarp operates at a frequency range of 2.7 to 10 MHz. It requires targeted, focused, powerful ultrasonic frequencies to even begin heat something as dense as rock in close proximity (ultrasonic is 20+MHz), You'd need something in the high gigahertz or even terahertz range (thousands of times more powerful than any current transmitter) to melt rock at distance.
Of course, it you want to ignore actual physics and common sense, your 5G cell phone (24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz) is more likely to cause an earthquake than haarp... 🤣
