Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Vinyl Records

I play vinyl. Analog vinyl and not digital. But on a high end stereo in the 10k range you have to. And believe me there's no comparison
helenS · 36-40, F
It's really easy to emulate vinyl records using digital equipment, and appropriate digital filters. According to Nyquist's theorem, a 44kHz digital sampling rate is sufficient to record anything you can hear. Then we have to apply some high-frequency filter bands to take the poor reproduction of sound using vinyl into account. 😏
Millerdog · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues the music you are listening to is so distorted you have no idea. Often those loud lead guitars are actually a few guitars blended. Neil Young is a master at doing this. Your D/A which converts it back to analog loses this. But on a department store quality stereo you can never hear it
@Millerdog For good audio imaging you want "linear phase" throughout your audio chain. Transistors excel at this. Power output tubes need output transformers and with output transformers, linear phase is harder to achieve. If you recall an old high end brand called PhaseLinear, they were selling linear phase amplifiers. Of course speakers with crossovers do crazy things with phase, so maybe it doesn't matter so much.
This message was deleted by its author.
StarLily · 51-55, F
Listening to vinyl right now.☺️
Millerdog · 56-60, M
@StarLily right on!
Really · 80-89, M
Without perfect hearing, which you begin to lose in your 30s, much of this conversation is irrelevant.
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
[media=https://youtu.be/nROrzgAjpQY]
Best song I had for comparison was escape from Berlin on her Other Side of the Mirror album. There was a Bass instrument part in there that you can only hear on vinyl and it shakes you to your core. I'd compare stereos with it.
CestManan · 46-50, F
I have some original pressing Pink Floyd LPS in near mint condition that I like to play on a portable Crossley. Is that a bad idea?
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
I have a large collection of 78 rpm.
helenS · 36-40, F
@BackyardShaman Vinyl or shellac?
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
Actually both, all kinds of music, and some old enough to be acoustical recordings . Very narrow bandwidth, noisy, and fun!@helenS
uncalled4 · 56-60, M
I like vinyl as well as digital. I'm one of the few people who never dumped their LPs in the 80s. But I can't make a blanket statement like one is clearly better, it varies from title to title and even within pressing runs. And as much as I like vinyl, it's such a PITA whereas digital is more set it and forget it. Some records are mastered and pressed well, some are not. Same with CDs, except now there's more room for error with excessive EQ and compression/limiting
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Millerdog · 56-60, M
@SW-User the vast majority don't have the equipment and can't afford it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Millerdog · 56-60, M
@SW-User what's wrong?
exexec · 61-69, C
My hearing isn't good enough to tell a difference. I trust your judgment.
Really · 80-89, M
@exexec So... "Never mind the sound. Listen to the music!"
Really · 80-89, M
@Millerdiog
you have to.

WOOF !
(it's a double pun)
Jimmy2016 · 61-69, M
🤔...............Vinyl rules!!

 
Post Comment