I think John McCain brought up a lot of good points yesterday.

I mean why should the FBI be investigating Trump if they're not investigating Clinton anymore? Finally someone besides Trump is talking in a way that makes sense to me.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

UserNameSW · 46-50, M

They are not investigating Clinton because they have no evidence of wrong doing. Dozens of investigations found zero wrong doing.

They are investigating trump and his associates because they have leads that suggest possible wrong doing. If they find nothing with the leads they will stop investigating him as well.

That is how investigation work.

katielass · F

@UserNameSW: Uh no, that;s not true. comey outlined all she had done wrong last summer just before he stupidly stated he wasn't recommending prosecution. No intent to break the law , my ass.

UserNameSW · 46-50, M

@katielass: he said she did stupid shit. Nothing that could be prosecuted.

Not illegal to be stupid.

katielass · F

@UserNameSW: Oh but she did break the law, comey said so. Oh and btw, google senate judiciary investigation of hillary.

UserNameSW · 46-50, M

He said low chance of conviction. That means a judge would be unlikely to find guilt. Not enough evidence to be found guilty.

The Senate tried and tried and then tried again. ..... found no concrete evidence of guilt.

katielass · F

@UserNameSW: Obviously you're in denial and hell bent on spinning but we all know she's guilty of everything she's ever been accused of. And you'll never change that.

UserNameSW · 46-50, M

If she were guilty why were chares never laid? Why was she never prosecuted? Why did every investigation come up with nothing?

katielass · F

@UserNameSW: I'm sure even you can figure that out.

UserNameSW · 46-50, M

@katielass: I can. It is easy. Not enough evidence to prove guilt. Plain and simple.