People are offended by a gay character in the new Beauty and the Beast?

They're saying things like: keep those kinds of things out of children's movies and stop shoving the gay agenda down our throats. So heterosexual relationships are okay, but God forbid homosexual relationships because children will start worshiping Satan if they see something like that?

Also, how is including a character that happens to not be heterosexual shoving any agenda down anyone's throat? That's just a realistic representation of human diversity. That's like saying including a black character is shoving the "black agenda" down people's throats.

These are the same people that whine about liberals being crybabies. I wonder if they've looked in the mirror recently...

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

JimboSaturn · 51-55, M

I fail to see how acknowledging the existence of gay people is ramming a gay agenda down my throat. If they don't like it move to Russia :P

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

Right? I just don't get it. He's the only gay person in the entire movie and the "gay scene" was him dancing with another guy. How is that even remotely pushing an agenda? It's called inclusivity, but apparently some people are allergic to that.

JimboSaturn · 51-55, M

It's pure homophobia plain and simple. @Killers:

marriedplus3 · 31-35, M

Im not gonna criticize the movie. But I choose not to let my kids watch it. Because while there's nothing wrong with being gay. Its just something is rather my kids not see. Oviously ill raise them to be str8. If they are gay is love them just as much but I'm gonna raise them to be str8

View 6 more replies »

This message was deleted by the author of the main post.

This message was deleted by its author.

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

@doctorlove: I accidently deleted his comment so here it is for reference:

[image/video deleted]

1.) What snake oil, quack doctor studies are you citing, because the studies I found show that homosexual parents are just as capable of raising a happy, healthy child as heterosexual parents. Many studies I found say that two parents are ideal, but the sex of the parents is fairly irrelevant because women can be masculine and men can be feminine.

Links:
+ https://qz.com/438469/the-science-is-clear-children-raised-by-same-sex-parents-are-at-no-disadvantage/
+ http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/15/health/health-of-children-with-same-sex-parents/
+ http://www.livescience.com/17913-advantages-gay-parents.html
+ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/using-pseudoscience-to-undermine-same-sex-parents/385604/

2.) No, homosexual relationships are not a "biological perversion". They are present in many other species, and unlike humans, those species don't berate and discriminate against their homosexual brethren.

3.) You're heavily implying that homosexuality is a "problem" or a health concern similar to obesity. That's comparing apples to oranges. Homosexuality between two consenting adults hurts nobody, and is none of your damn business. They don't need help. YOU need help.

4.) Jack off to Breitbart, and fuck off from here, buddy-o.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

doctorlove · M

People are going to pressure you to be quiet about your sensible critical thinking. Stay strong, stand tall.

Dewms

Triggered by LeFou :'(

Add a comment...