Any bets? CAN it be done? WILL it be done?

Poll - Total Votes: 8

Trump will bomb the Iranian nuclear sites directly, involving the US directly in the Iran war.

Trump will GIVE the bunker buster bombs to Israel, and LOAN them the B52's, making THEM responsible.

The bunker busters will be ineffective...so...moot point.

Trump will NOT give our bunker busters to Israel.

Other....please elucidate.

Show Results

You may vote on multiple answers, up to 3.

Iranian nuclear enrichment sites are located at 300 feet below ground underneath dolomite and other strong natural rock formations.

Bunker buster bombs have only been tested as effective at 200 feet below the ground.

The Israelis have already bombed the sites...and to what depth or extent the rock structure has been destroyed by them is unknown.

Should Trump GIVE Israel the bunker buster bombs? Or should he fly them directly to the Iranian Nuclear sites in the B52 stealth bombers, which are the only bombers strong enough to carry these heavy bombs?

Is Trump about to involve the United States directly in a war with Iran?

What do YOU think will be effective? What do YOU think will happen?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Gibbon · 70-79, M

Those big bunker busters can be dropped sequentially to implode the cavity beneath. There's no air opposition over Iran

DO IT

pentagrammom

@Gibbon or the mainframe can just be shut down quietly no destructive delusional fiction just a quiet end to a fictional fallacy

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom 👀 whatever that means.

pentagrammom

@Gibbon yes, that means the watchers and the purveyors of deepfake media get shut down quietly at their source the mainframe processing and producing such no spectacle just a gentle end of that narrative

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom

pentagrammom

@Gibbon as a represent of humanity i gracefully acknowledge the attempt that doesn't have a place in my reality all methods of the system known and i have seperated said system from what is experience based unassimilated personal memory

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom Oh well. Sometimes laughs are hard to come by. I think mostly because of lost understanding.

pentagrammom

@Gibbon the mental evolution isn't the same for all that would be the source of that comment i am responding to it's written at source from assumptions that lack certain knowledge

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom Again whatever. I'm immune to such accusations.

pentagrammom

@Gibbon no accusation in the comment however the algorithmic mimic of my previous input is evident

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom

pentagrammom

@Gibbon the system is really showing it's lack of originality,, perhaps a shutdown to allow an organic new ness would be an idea

pentagrammom

@Gibbon prthaps it could remember not knowing the original design had a failsafe mecchanism

Gibbon · 70-79, M

@pentagrammom A visual result of failing words.

pentagrammom

@Gibbon yes the systems fx plays however that failsafe is in the mainframe and has that locked and processing to no avail but do show the illogical resource waste for a failing narrative