This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
In this case it was not only inevitable, it was necessary. As in the case of Germany, in pre WWII when everyone knew they were building for another war with Hitler and they could have been stopped by Britain alone at one point...but no one wanted conflict and Chamberlain want to try appeasement to avoid conflict. That did not work. It wont work now. A nuclear Iran means a nuclear war between Israel and Iran...Or a world gripped in fear of suitcase nuclear weapons being planted all over the world in a massive destructive attack by Islam on the world.
That can never be allowed. The world does not want that, and everyone has been trying to appease Iran for far too long. The war is on, they are weak, and even the people of Iran do not want this regime of terror as their leaders.
Conflict will stop nuclear terrorism and allow the people of Iran to be peaceful and prosperous.
That can never be allowed. The world does not want that, and everyone has been trying to appease Iran for far too long. The war is on, they are weak, and even the people of Iran do not want this regime of terror as their leaders.
Conflict will stop nuclear terrorism and allow the people of Iran to be peaceful and prosperous.