I bet you can't prove that 0 is the smallest natural number.

@666Maggotz -1 is one for example.

@Luke73 well if anything less than 0 is unnatural, then of course 0 is the smallest. 🫠

@666Maggotz Well not quite. -1 only exists in the set of integers and to define that, you need the natural numbers.

@Luke73 I never learned any of this because I hardly ever showed up to school, that’s why I’m asking you lol I never even knew there were unnatural numbers.

@666Maggotz Well the term unnatural numbers doesn't quite exist.