Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is it this way?

Why does feminism consider it liberation for a lady to slave away for a capitalist who will replace her the second she keels over, but oppression for her to serve and love a husband who serves and loves her in return?
Top | New | Old
It's a matter of choice.
If a person cannot choose her role, she unable to make the best use of her talents.
If she's obliged to be a housewife and mother with no access to earning her own income, she becomes almost a slave - more so if the family's faith requires that she must obey him.

There's no guarantee that the husband actually does serve and love her. The rate of men who commit adultery is estimated to be about 90%.
What he earns, he would earn anyway, if if he had no wife or family.
49% of first marriages end in divorce. Which suggests halt for nearly half, love does not last for either the man or the woman. If they're religious and stay married, it is often a lifetime commitment to mutual misery. Happy and long lived marriages are rare.
For each second marriage, the divorce rate is higher. The more divorces a person has had, the less likely their next marriage is to succeed.

At any point in history, if you added up the work a woman does and the standard wages that she'd be paid for that work if she was an employee and not a wife and mother, the cost of employing her would be far more than 90% of men could afford.

Many women are far happier and more fulfilled when they earn a living. When they contribute their brains, skills and training, the world is a better place.

But that's not to say that women working solves all their problems. If can also create a few problems, especially if working conditions are not modified to ensure that children get the care and education they need via accessible and affordable preschools.
Northwest · M
If she doesn't like a job, and she skills/education, she can look for a better job.

If she has no skills/education, and is totally reliant on a man, whose children she's pumping out, what are her options when he gets a mistress?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Northwest · M
@TheEmperor All of it is incompatible with you NOT wanting her to work. But when you say:

I like people being dependent.

It explains it all
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
Quitting a job bears far less consequences than divorcing a husband. A job contract is usually transparent and serves as a legal document. You agree on terms and rules and if your employer breaks them you can sue him or her. In marriage/partnership, all depends on mutual trust that the other side will do as promised. And there's no transparency in reward for the work that is being done. Typically, there's no financial reward, therefore a stay at home partner has no money of their own.

Some women slave both as a workforce for society and for their husband who thinks it's beneath him to help with house chores.
It's always about people and their agreements, but also about the third side one can turn to if their rights were violated in some way.
Jill1990 · 31-35, F
A bit of an over simplification isn’t it. I’m not a feminist, but we should all be treated equal.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Feminists recognize that it's oppressive when a woman is forced to do anything. We should all have the choice to live how we want.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@TheEmperor Apology accepted.
SW-User
Real feminism is giving her the freedom to pick either one, or a mix of both.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
That's nothing to do with feminism
calicuz · 56-60, M
Exactly!!!
The whole "Women's Liberation" was a sham. It was Started by Corporate America to increase the number of workers in the workforce to keep wages down.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Husbands are capable of replacing their wives. It's called divorce 🙄
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment