What's Wrong With The Past Tense?
Why do so many historians always talk in the Present Tense even when describing events of a thousand years ago?
It sounds lazy or worse, pretentious.
I know some novellists have been writing in the present tense for a long time, but I associate that with "airport novels" stuff dashed off in a hurry to pay the bills and to suit the demands of publishers run by money-traders rather than literary people.
It sounds lazy or worse, pretentious.
I know some novellists have been writing in the present tense for a long time, but I associate that with "airport novels" stuff dashed off in a hurry to pay the bills and to suit the demands of publishers run by money-traders rather than literary people.





