Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What's the worst lie you were told?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
gol979 · 41-45, M
Asymptomatic spread was real
Eklipse · F
@gol979 Hey, I caught that stuff. It consumed me for days on end and I'm resolved that if a fourth cocktail comes out, I'd take it anyway.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Eklipse asymptomatic spread is a big fat lie
Eklipse · F
@gol979 Then how do you catch it according to you? There's symptomless people that transmit it anyway 👀
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Eklipse again, asymptomatic spread is a disgusting lie. I dont know how you got it? Did you take a fraudulent test saying youve got "covid"? Did you get it after injections?
AbbySvenz · F
I’d like to see the peer reviewed papers you read (or, even better, submitted) that support that claim @gol979
@gol979 Do you also want to be buried on the hill you are choosing to die on?
AbbySvenz · F
How about the hill of papers that refute his claim?@canusernamebemyusername
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
@gol979 and you know this how?
gol979 · 41-45, M
@ozgirl512 @AbbySvenz @canusernamebemyusername this has been known for decades. If you want to believe that you can pass a bug on when you arent sick, fair enough
AbbySvenz · F
You don’t pass the bug on if you’re not sick— you pass it on after you’ve been infected but before you start showing symptoms (hence, [i]a[/i]symptomatic)

So all the studies on transmissibility that have been conducted, their data coallated, statistically analyzed, and written up in papers, which are then peer reviewed… are all wrong?*

A more statistically likely conclusion is that all of those thousands of scientists, mathematicians, epidemiologists, virologists, and other experts [i]just might [/i]know a thing or two that you don’t.@gol979


* the last data I saw indicated that two days prior to showing symptoms to three days after seems to be SARS-COV-2’s peak transmissibility