Whats with all these healthy people suddenly dropping dead?!

@PhoenixPhail Only in rightwingers's fictional pink world

@Elessar I'm neither a right-winger, nor live in a fictional, pink world.

People are always going to come up with whatever findings justify their beliefs about [i]anything.[/i]
My findings are based on scientific fact. Most people's findings are based on what they've seen and heard through mainstream media, which is where they're getting their misinformation which they take as truth.

The media is owned and operated by those who [i]need[/i] for the public to believe the official narrative in order for their plandemic agenda to be played out.

Did you even bother to watch the latest video I posted on the subject?

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/covid-crimes-documentary-interview_hqM839Cgyu2emHI.html

@Elessar I'm not willing to argue or debate these points with anyone.
I present my findings for other's consideration. I know what I've seen and believe in it, in the same way you have done the same. I can agree to disagree. I know the channels where I find my information, are NOT conspiracy based, and that it's the [i]government[/i] and the [i]media[/i] which are spreading disinformation. It's the only way they can succeed in carrying out their mass-depopulation and creation of a totalitarian government agendas. But to those who are hooked into believing the official narrative, they'll never see it any other way.

Mike Yeadon is the former VP for Pfizer. He has [i]no motive[/i] to disinform the public. He makes no money in expressing his truth, and puts himself in harm's way by doing so. And you really think what he says is a conspiracy theory?

https://rumble.com/v13clyt-who-and-what-are-powering-the-global-covid-lies-dr.-mike-yeadon-interview-w.html

@PhoenixPhail You can't prove that some article is (or isn't) government-sponsored just like you can't prove it is (or isn't) sponsored by the fascist opposition. Plain and simple. And anyone has a price, an ex VP of a Pharma corporation can definitely be bought by billionaires and oligarchs, assuming he's not already himself in support of what said billionaires and oligarchs aim to (and thus come to them for free).

The fact that the city I am in or the city you're in has not magically de-populated ever since mass vaccination became a thing is a tad stronger as evidence than the mere words of a single man that can very well be colluded with wannabe-totalitarians.

And literally no one who's blinded by propaganda will admit or even believe they're blinded by propaganda, that's how it works. Reason why I'm trusting what I see even more than what I read. Where are all those corpses?

@Elessar Okay, here's [i]another[/i] report among a quickly growing number of reports from qualified doctors all saying the same thing.

Dr. Peter McCullough on Covid Vaccines
https://www.brighteon.com/78763bd3-7646-4d20-bf14-51ce6c97953a

@PhoenixPhail Again, the word of a small group of men that can very likely be presumed to be bought versus the self-evident and undeniable fact that if you go outdoors you're not faced with mountains of corpses.

The only piles of coffins I remember are those that used to be stacked in 2020 when covid hit here in full force first and there were no vaccines, no therapeutics and no PPEs

@Elessar THE REAL DISINFORMATION SUPERSPREADERS: From the US President, Government agencies, Gates, the media & paid personalities. EVERYTHING THEY'RE TELLING YOU ALL LIES!

https://www.brighteon.com/1fe7ab63-a57c-4e02-92a4-ac4ad4476ec4

@PhoenixPhail Again, that's not a source. I can write an article like that too, claiming that the moon is made of cheese and that everyone who says otherwise is lying.

Where are the mountain of corpses? Why every single person I know who's taken the vaccine (relatives, colleagues, customers, friends) are all alive and well?

@Elessar We'll both find our never-ending justifications for supporting our claims. However, we're still very early in our "vaccine" trials, and, other than those who have died within days of receiving the vaccine or have been permanently maimed by them, the following months and years of effects are yet to be known.

Another issues, is that of exercises in competitive inhibition. In the need for people to protect their identities at all cost, there's the need to know, regardless if [i]what's[/i] know is "right" or "wrong." Once the need to know is satisfied, any other answer to the case in point is disregarded, regardless if another answer is better than the one they're clinging to, or not.

So, even though you may come across a better, more concise, more reasonable explanation than what you know to be true, that answer will be competitively inhibited out, leaving you with your satisfaction of knowing, which is more important than any truth in fact.

I wish you well, along with with the bio-weapon jabs, along with your colleagues, coworkers, friend and family.
I hope it all works out for you all. I have no viable, rational science-based rather than media-based choice but to go with my truth.

Respectfully. 🤝

@PhoenixPhail [quote] those who have died within days of receiving the vaccine or have been permanently maimed by them[/quote]
Who are them and in which percentage, relatively to the recipients? Every drug has side effects, and potentially lethal ones too. The alternative to this drug is a much greater chance of contracting a severe or even fatal case of COVID, it's not that we're vaccinating just because we have nothing better to spend taxes money on, we do because it's the (statistically) lesser evil.

Similarly, if you contract a bacterial infection, will you risk it fighting with your body alone the pre-1900s way, dismissing antibiotics because they have that 1:10,000 or less chance of giving you a fatal case of the Stevens-Johnson syndrome?

[quote]any other answer to the case in point is disregarded, regardless if another answer is better than the one they're clinging to, or not.[/quote]
But I've made my condition clear enough - I'll retract my position when I'll see vaccines causing as many corpses as I saw uncontrasted COVID cause at the very first. It's a tangible, objectively observable/measurable event, literal mountains of corpses are impossible to hide.

If govts want to depopulate the world all they had to do was allowing COVID to do its job undisturbed. Or contaminating water supplies with some lethal pollutant (even better, because they would selectively kill some populations while leaving themselves unharmed). It makes literally zero sense to use vaccines as similar weapons because 1) it's costly, 2) it's optional, 3) it raises suspicions.

[quote] the following months and years of effects are yet to be known[/quote]
Neither are for COVID; there are plentyful of viruses that give terminal diseases such as cancer as late as 7 years or more from "recovery". As I said, it's a matter of taking the lesser risk, there isn't a zero risk option here.

@Elessar https://rumble.com/vpknov-covid-from-a-nurses-perspective..html

@PhoenixPhail Yes, it's still a questionable source from potentially corrupted people that isn't anywhere as strong as going in my balcony and noticing zero mountains of corpses outside, in a city of 100k+

@Elessar Okay. 😊