Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What secret about your industry can you share now that you don’t work for them anymore?

Here is one I just read. What's yours?

Oh boy, where do I even start? After 8 years as an auto insurance agent, I have zero loyalty left to protect these companies.

We Had "Loyalty Lists" Every month, I'd get a report of customers who hadn't shopped around in 2+ years. These were our golden geese - we could raise their rates aggressively because they'd proven they wouldn't leave. One customer I remember was paying $3,200 annually for coverage that should have cost $1,800. She stayed for 5 years.

The "File and Use" Scam Here's something most people don't know: in many states, insurance companies can raise your rates immediately and justify it later. We'd implement 15-20% increases across entire ZIP codes, knowing regulators would take months to review. By then, we'd collected millions in extra premiums.

Claim Frequency Was Irrelevant Your rates weren't really based on how often you'd claim - they were based on how likely you were to shop around. A customer with 3 claims who got quotes every year paid less than a claim-free customer who never compared rates. It was pure price discrimination.

We Loved Policy Confusion Complex policy language wasn't an accident. The more confusing your coverage, the less likely you'd comparison shop effectively. We'd change terminology between companies deliberately to make apple-to-apple comparisons nearly impossible.

The Real Game-Changer Tools like ComparisonAdviser absolutely terrify insurance companies because they eliminate our biggest advantage: information asymmetry. When customers can instantly see what competitors charge with identical coverage and discounts applied, our whole "loyalty tax" model collapses.

I've watched too many good people get fleeced by an industry that profits from customer ignorance. Use ComparisonAdviser religiously - it's the only way to beat a system designed to exploit your trust.

The truth? Every year you don't comparison shop, you're probably donating $500-1,500 to your insurance company's profit margins.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HumanEarth · F
Here is another post

Jewelry. The diamond engagement ring you bought, at any point in time, is worth pennies after purchase.

It’s like buying a car. Once you leave the store it’s only worth 10% of what you paid. If you are lucky.

All other gemstones have an even lower return on value. Non-gemstone styles are worth only what someone else is willing to pay for it.

Many diamonds you purchase at retail stores are second-hand. There is no regulation that requires them to tell you that it is second hand, damaged, or even if the grading is current and correct.

Also, diamonds may be strong but THEY CAN CRACK. If you hit them to hard on something it can cause a crack.

Do not buy diamonds or other gemstones that are heat treated or fracture filled. Jewelry stores won’t always tell you that a gemstone has this and you don’t find out until you are trying to resale for pennies.

IF you do decide to get married or purchase nice jewelry make sure it has a grading certificate from GIA. They are the top grading house in the world and the most precise. However, know that in 5 years they can recalibrate their own standards and your item can have lower grading in the 4c’s. Please also purchase from the more high-end stores like Cartier and Tiffany’s, the value holds better because of the name brand. (Also, keep your boxes and paperwork from the places.)

If I ever get married, I would never allow my partner to buy me a diamond ring. Gold band all the way! Put the money in investments for you wedding, kids, honeymoon, or whatever but not in a ring that holds no real value.

Remember, something is only valuable if it is rare……
@HumanEarth or as much as a person is willing to pay
HumanEarth · F
You should see the others i'm reading on the other website, man some are really bad
HumanEarth · F
Like this one

I worked in a senior position at a major pharma that was a pioneer in vaccine development. And I learned there that, although vaccine development (“biologics”) demands as much effort as drug development, there’s much more emphasis on the latter therapeutical approach than on the former preventative approach.

And the reason is simple. Put scientists to work for a few years developing a vaccine, and you can sell it once to everybody. Put scientists to work for a few years developing a therapeutic drug, and you can sell it month by month to lots of people (though not everybody) forever. A corporation has the legal obligation to maximize shareholder value, so most of the effort goes into therapeutics. And not all possible therapeutics either, because you want that “lots of people” to be a big group, so conditions suffered by a tiny minority are not profitable.

So from a business standpoint, vaccines and orphan drugs are a loss leader for pharma. And from a political standpoint, arguing that Big Pharma is bad because they rip us off for the vaccines is ludicrous.