This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
iQuit · F
Technically for her to be a girl she is any where from 10 to 17...
First thing -I am thinking is WHERE the HECK were her parents when she got pregnant... POINT 2 -A majority of states require parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion- I would hope then the parents stepped up and involved themselves more with their daughters life occurrences.
SW-User
@ForNever: "by age 20" ..... as if we need a reminder what a teen is
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: "BY AGE 18" is adult... in the US, Mexico and Canada and parts of South America as well... AS if you forgot
SW-User
@ForNever: I'm quoting your infographic. It's redundant to say "1 in 4 teens" and then follow it with "by age 20". I don't really care about your position on this, it's just a poorly done graphic
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: #1-GOOGLE search the infographic and you'll quickly discover the origin is- https://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/about/
#2-I don't care about your position either-
#3-if your strong about your conviction in the graphics then take it up with the US government and not me.
#2-I don't care about your position either-
#3-if your strong about your conviction in the graphics then take it up with the US government and not me.
SW-User
@ForNever: Oh FFS! I'm pointing out a redundancy in design and you're getting up in arms by making bullet points! Fuck me...
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: Well you look into detail- the points are so you can see it clearly and move on to who you need to be talking to so your "problem" be handled with accordingly - Good Luck
SW-User
@ForNever: You seem to have forgotten a few words in your response because I can't really tell what you're trying to say
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: nope...nothing else to say JUST RE-READ STEPS #1 #2 and #3 and you'll be fine- Good Luck with your battle to fight the infograph government design
SW-User
@ForNever: Why are you so hostile? Jesus, I just pointed one thing out and you've been rude and condescending this whole time. I didn't even disagree with you on anything. Are you like this with everyone that doesn't support everything you do?
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: Maybe you're reading it in a tone that sounds hostile...and I am merely making things stand out so- aesthetically you are not bothered - I am being nice by wishing you GOOD LUCK on your en-devours in correcting the said infograph
SW-User
@ForNever: Nobody really types that way. Highlighting, underlining and going with all-caps at someone is a passive-aggressive way of treating them like they're too stupid to read the actual text. That's the only time I've ever seen things typed that.
I don't need your instructions or your good luck wishes because I'm not trying to change the graphic. I just made one observation and it devolved into this. I'm not even sure if it's possible to have a civil discussion online anymore
I don't need your instructions or your good luck wishes because I'm not trying to change the graphic. I just made one observation and it devolved into this. I'm not even sure if it's possible to have a civil discussion online anymore
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: Hmmm... Are you sure? Where are your facts to back up this statement?
If NOYONE used this then it would be available for easy access - obviously.
CAPS are just an easy way to make something stand out.
You are welcome to interpret this any way your mind thinks it is-
ULTIMATELY, if you choose to ignore what I say about my intent- then, that is on you.
Well- I have yet to use vulgar or profane language so - your premise is a tad bit diluted.
Nonetheless, GOOD LUCK may you convince the government to reform the infograph.
If NOYONE used this then it would be available for easy access - obviously.
CAPS are just an easy way to make something stand out.
You are welcome to interpret this any way your mind thinks it is-
ULTIMATELY, if you choose to ignore what I say about my intent- then, that is on you.
Well- I have yet to use vulgar or profane language so - your premise is a tad bit diluted.
Nonetheless, GOOD LUCK may you convince the government to reform the infograph.
SW-User
@ForNever: If you want proof, click on any or all posts on this site and see how many people type that way. You won't find any. Bolding and underlining are tools for separating and organizing thoughts. That's why they're there. But if you're going to play innocent on this then I'll leave you be. Arguing intent is always an exercise in futility.
I never mentioned any intent to reform the graphic and specifically I said I wasn't in the last post, but you seem to have it stuck in your head that my simple observation is some sort of crusade to edit it my way. There's no point in wishing me good luck on this unless you're trying to condescend. Either way, I'm out. Enjoy the ride on your high horse
I never mentioned any intent to reform the graphic and specifically I said I wasn't in the last post, but you seem to have it stuck in your head that my simple observation is some sort of crusade to edit it my way. There's no point in wishing me good luck on this unless you're trying to condescend. Either way, I'm out. Enjoy the ride on your high horse
iQuit · F
@HalfCactus: #1 That is a mere statistic- not a conclusive absolute determinant.
#2 You brought the graphic into frame it that is your prerogative, then who am I to tell you not to TALK TO THE GOVERNMENT- who is responsible in its construction.
#3 Regardless, GOOD LUCK on whatever you choose to do- As you enjoy commenting on others post for whatever your own excuse may be, instead of answering the original question through your own individual post.
#2 You brought the graphic into frame it that is your prerogative, then who am I to tell you not to TALK TO THE GOVERNMENT- who is responsible in its construction.
#3 Regardless, GOOD LUCK on whatever you choose to do- As you enjoy commenting on others post for whatever your own excuse may be, instead of answering the original question through your own individual post.