Don't you know that the science is settled?

In the 1920s it was scientifically accepted that rockets could not produce thrust in a vacuum. It was a hotly debated topic and anyone who disagreed with that thinking was shunned. It was only in 1969 the the New York Times finally admitted that the 1920s science was wrong.

Top | New | Old

HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M

Lots of scientists had egg on their face in 1905 because of a Swiss patent clerk

View 26 more replies »

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@newjaninev2 To you? Why you can't read them. Too Funny!!! This isn't exactly a symposium. Maybe you hadn't noticed that. Far greater minds than yours have concluded that Chemical Predestination doesn't work. That includes the author of the book Chemical Predestination. There is that little inconvenient matter of INFORMATION that chemicals and mere materialism can never explain.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@hippyjoe1955 Umm... you seem to having a conversation with someone else and to have accidentally sent the comment to me.

My remark to you was: "Anyone involved in science (as opposed to technology) would have responded with recent publication history and number of citations flowing from those publications”

Perhaps you’d like to re-address your latest comment to its intended recipient, and then address the comment I made.

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@newjaninev2 You can't read my comment to you? Strange. Oh well no one ever accused you of being very bright. You think that materialism is a viable theory. Too Funny!!! Run along Toots you are looking more foolish all the time.

SW-User

exactly. Science is always adapting and changing and that's good. That's how science works. Any theory could be altered at any time with new data.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Paliglass · 41-45, F

Quantum engines are the way forward.

Add a comment...