Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Global warming? Why the hell is it snowing near spring!?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
because global warming died in 2008 after the french did a study of 470,000 year of ice and proved man has nothing to do with the temps of the earth because when he wasn't here it was hotter..that's why the liberals changed it to climate change...for the money... but the truth is out there so no one is paying
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@ajsk13 You were saying?

BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Greenbare If by “real people” you mean “science deniers.” Lemme guess, you think evolution is false too?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Greenbare No, dippity, peer reviewed means they were checked by other members of scientific institutions.

Yes, follow the money! Please, do that. And who do think has the money? Fossil fuel industries, duh. They benefit from denying climate change because then they continue to make billions of dollars.

Look at the EPA. The president banned any EPA scientists from sitting on the board unless they’re funded by an oil company. Where do you think he money is?
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
@BlueMetalChick Let me ask you a question that was pointed out to me by a scientist, where does the money come from to study various topics scientist study? From grants from governments..and why would politicians want studies on various topics? To spend the tax payers money for agendas the politicians wish to back.. and the conclusions have to back the politicians as they are funding the conclusion they wish to spend the money on.. science has nothing to do with it it's all about the money , this is why the studies you site have NO meaning as they were based on models of predictions ,NOT science.. It HAS BEEN THAT WAY ALL MY LIFE in 1972 they claimed calif would be under water right NOW , did you notice it didn't happen? I did ..The french study was science that why the name was changed in 2008 to climate change look it up you have been duped
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@ajsk13 Now let me ask you a question. Who do you think has a conflict of interest? The scientists working on dinky little few thousand dollar grants, or the massive multibilion dollar fossil fuel companies that benefit from people believing global warming is a hoax?

I can’t understand how you people can find a conspiracy in the opposite direction.

Your French study claim is bullshit, by the way, look up the ice core data that was recorded and the conclusions drawn from it. You made up that entire line about 470,000 years.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Greenbare There is no multi billion dollar fraud, the billions of dollars are going to the oil companies who are benefiting from the government denying global warming. How do you not get that?
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
@BlueMetalChick lol and that is why Noaa was was just busted changing the numbers AGAIN , it also happened a couple years ago with nasa ,a computer glitch cause them to miss a piece of ice the size of califorina in their calculations.. every time a liberal get in office this BS happens ,they have No real ideas so they have to scare us into following their agendas. tried to post the link as I saved it on my browser but wouldn't you know it ,nasa deleted it go figure
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
@BlueMetalChick https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@ajsk13 You're undermining yourself with that article. It says multiple NOAA analysts who were tied to private companies manipulated climate records to make it seem as if there was less evidence of climate change than the real records showed. Read your own source before you post it please.

[quote]every time a liberal get in office this BS happen[/quote]
What are you talking about? Liberals don't believe in climate change. Here in America we have a liberal president, Donald Trump, and he thinks climate change is a hoax.

[quote]No real ideas so they have to scare us into following their agendas.[/quote]
Because scientific fact is "an agenda" and "no real ideas". But the word of the fossil fuel industry who are profiting off of it is totally trustworthy, right?

Oh how fucking convenient, "I had irrefutable proof but, uh...NASA deleted it."
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
@BlueMetalChick it just happen again last week my dear
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/24/delingpole-noaa-caught-lying-arctic-sea-ice/

did you not look at the link in my last post?
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@ajsk13 Did you read the first article you posted? You attacked your own argument. It said the NOAA members altered the recorded data to hide evidence of climate change. For Christ sake, read your own fucking source before you post it.

And please, for the love of god, don't link me to Breitbart. This is the same organization that claimed the missing Malaysia Airlines plane may have gotten swallowed by a black hole. Breitbart published an article claiming the Las Vegas shooting was the work of Muslim communists trying to start a second Bolshevik Revolution.
ajsk13 · 51-55, M
@BlueMetalChick https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

https://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/

I can go on and on
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@ajsk13 That's the exact same one you posted earlier, that's the one that you didn't read before you posted it. The article says that several NOAA members who were tied to private companies previously altered the records to hide data that suggested climate change is real. You're proving me right.