I think men should make females sign contracts that states neither party wants to become a parent, what are your thoughts

Im watching this tv show about mens reproductive rights. I think it is some cases unfair for a man to forced into fatherhood/ child support, such as this girl told her bf after they had discussed not wanting children and she claimed to have a medical condition that prevents pregnancy but still on the pill for medical reasons then got pregnant anyway and chose to keep the child. I thinks it's unfair in some cases (that's where it gets tricky) like when deliberately get pregnant without informing the male. It's just something to ponder. But I think it can be unfair that men have no rights and they should try contracts signed by both parties

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Starcrossed · 41-45, F

A man can control when he does or doesn't have sex and who he has sex with. If he doesn't want to become a parent, then he should be taking steps to ensure that he won't - either by prophylactics, abstinence, or choosing to only having sex with someone he has vetted as being emotionally stable, who will responsibly ensure her birth control regimen is followed. If either party was told they can't have kids, would you hold the physician who made that diagnosis accountable (no you wouldn't). NO birth control method is 100% effective except not having sex. Misdiagnoses of infertility happen.
Procreation from failed BC or assumed infertility was a risk they both willingly took. It is absolutely fair both parties be held responsible for that unintended pregnancy if she chooses not to terminate.

abe182 · 46-50, M

@Starcrossed what if she lied?

Starcrossed · 41-45, F

@abe182 Then his character vetting is pretty shitty.