Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hearing inhumane stuff like this fuels my anger.

[c=#BF0000]http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-21/aflie-evans-uk-parents-lose-battle-for-toddler-life-support/9469548?pfmredir=sm[/c]
Since when do the courts have a right to decide who lives and who dies? If I were the Dad, I would hang that judge with barbed wire until his head falls off.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SwarmSona · F
Because after a certain point things get into the realm of is what we're doing here humane? Will the slim chance of recovery even result in a good quality of life? How will the child's development be effected if this is allowed to be draw out for months ... years? Insurance? Liability?

A human life is an irreplaceable thing. But everything in this world has a price tag, and money ain't always it.
SW-User
@SwarmSona even though the young tot couldn’t speak for himself, it’s the parents who should be entitled to that right not some fat cunt with a wig,hammer and black robe, I bet if the parents were billionaires it would be a different kettle of fish, and that’s what’s destroying humanity. We all know the value of nothing but the price of everything.
SwarmSona · F
A child isn't born of itself. At that age the kids thoughts are irrelevant because they'd lack the complexity to even deal with the situation.

Money means the doctor is a personal hire and wouldn't have deemed the extended life support as inhumane regardless of the the situation. A kid lying in a near death state for years on end with a more than likely deformed body would be the result most likely. Is the billionaire kid really better off? who knows