The initial announcement of Rosemont Seneca (belonging to the Biden and friends) and the Chinese government's company came in 2013.Wall Street Journal

@Northwest
Is there anyone you love more than a misspelled word?

@MarthannBann888 [quote]Is there anyone you love more than a misspelled word?
[/quote]

Why am I not surprised with your Strawman?

You "quoted" the Wall Street Journal. I'm questioning your quote, based on the extremely unlikely event, that they Wall Street Journal doesn't know the difference between 'duel' and 'dual', leaving me with the only reasonable conclusion: That the WSJ is misquoted, or that this is made up and not really what the WSJ said.

@Northwest
However proud you may be of your OCD, if it keeps you from a responsible consideration of the peril all of the world is in, then then it would be to your advantage to find a compromise in your attention. That solution would allow you your ocd, and have it not divert your attention in times of crisis.
The matter i speak is critical to the lives of human beings, i would hope they are more important to you than a misspelled word. In other words, i hope there is someone you love more than a misspelled word.
In a world fixated on the love life of Donald Trump and who was raped vs. who is in it for the money, the real dangers loom like giant mountains in the distance.
The situation reminds me of a line in Paradise Lost.
"For shame oh man
That thou dost war with one another
And waste the earth
When your real enemy neither slumbers nor sleeps
And prowls day and night seeking your destruction."

Two words in the above do not meet with spell check standards, i use them in their original spelling.

@MarthannBann888 [quote]However proud you may be of your OCD, if it keeps you from a responsible consideration of the peril all of the world is in, then then it would be to your advantage to find a compromise in your attention. That solution would allow you your ocd, and have it not divert your attention in times of crisis.
The matter i speak is critical to the lives of human beings, i would hope they are more important to you than a misspelled word. In other words, i hope there is someone you love more than a misspelled word.
In a world fixated on the love life of Donald Trump and who was raped vs. who is in it for the money, the real dangers loom like giant mountains in the distance.
The situation reminds me of a line in Paradise Lost.
"For shame oh man
That thou dost war with one another
And waste the earth
When your real enemy neither slumbers nor sleeps
And prowls day and night seeking your destruction."

Two words in the above do not meet with spell check standards, i use them in their original spelling.[/quote]

And thank you for using another Strawman, to prove my point. 🤣

@Northwest
So if you are serious about the particularities and not the real issues and this is ok for you, maybe you are a foolhardy idiot. As far as the above post, "dual" was the most likely event.....a typo!

Another Straw man? Don't answer my posts unless i can get my feet wet in your shallow mind.

@MarthannBann888 OK dude, so you want to engage in ad hominem. It figures. The point is going over your head, and you are engaging in strawman arguments, because the comment is not about spelling, it's about your claim that it came from the WSJ, without any references, more like a single reference an actual quote, in between quotation marks, implying that it did not come from the WSJ, and it's very unlikely the WSJ would misspell dual.

@Northwest

The Wall Street Journal is not the reference. WSJ is the secondary source. The original source is the National Select Committee on US Military and Commercial Concerns with the Peoples Republic of China, H.R., at 75
1 (1999).

I dare to point out that there is certainly knowledge you hold that I do not. Likewise, there is knowledge I hold you do not. It is hard to determine what you know as you say so little, and confine yourself to constant criticism and attention to details of little or no consequence.

Are you attempting to divert attention away from the miserable performance of the current administration? Or, is that performance eluding your attention due to your proclivity for the insignificant.

Perhaps if you and your fellow dems could look at the entire political picture rather then focus only on Trumps love life, a found to be fake Russian collusion, or arguing over particulars in favor of actual and important issues some common ground could possibly be found. As it is, your attitude demands response in kind, but I will not be diverted from the truly important issue of the traitor in chief.

@MarthannBann888 Look bro, you're diverting, again and resorting to strawman propositions. Not going to play that game.