Northwest · M
The WSJ learned how to misspell "dual" as well? That's in quotes and pretty amazing that they did that. 🤣🤣
Give it up dude.
Give it up dude.
View 5 more replies »
Northwest · M
@MarthannBann888 OK dude, so you want to engage in ad hominem. It figures. The point is going over your head, and you are engaging in strawman arguments, because the comment is not about spelling, it's about your claim that it came from the WSJ, without any references, more like a single reference an actual quote, in between quotation marks, implying that it did not come from the WSJ, and it's very unlikely the WSJ would misspell dual.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@Northwest
The Wall Street Journal is not the reference. WSJ is the secondary source. The original source is the National Select Committee on US Military and Commercial Concerns with the Peoples Republic of China, H.R., at 75
1 (1999).
I dare to point out that there is certainly knowledge you hold that I do not. Likewise, there is knowledge I hold you do not. It is hard to determine what you know as you say so little, and confine yourself to constant criticism and attention to details of little or no consequence.
Are you attempting to divert attention away from the miserable performance of the current administration? Or, is that performance eluding your attention due to your proclivity for the insignificant.
Perhaps if you and your fellow dems could look at the entire political picture rather then focus only on Trumps love life, a found to be fake Russian collusion, or arguing over particulars in favor of actual and important issues some common ground could possibly be found. As it is, your attitude demands response in kind, but I will not be diverted from the truly important issue of the traitor in chief.
The Wall Street Journal is not the reference. WSJ is the secondary source. The original source is the National Select Committee on US Military and Commercial Concerns with the Peoples Republic of China, H.R., at 75
1 (1999).
I dare to point out that there is certainly knowledge you hold that I do not. Likewise, there is knowledge I hold you do not. It is hard to determine what you know as you say so little, and confine yourself to constant criticism and attention to details of little or no consequence.
Are you attempting to divert attention away from the miserable performance of the current administration? Or, is that performance eluding your attention due to your proclivity for the insignificant.
Perhaps if you and your fellow dems could look at the entire political picture rather then focus only on Trumps love life, a found to be fake Russian collusion, or arguing over particulars in favor of actual and important issues some common ground could possibly be found. As it is, your attitude demands response in kind, but I will not be diverted from the truly important issue of the traitor in chief.
Northwest · M
@MarthannBann888 Look bro, you're diverting, again and resorting to strawman propositions. Not going to play that game.
This message was deleted by its author.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@BackyardShaman Really,tell me how?
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@BackyardShaman
What no reply??? Nothing to demonstrate your facility at documenting what you say? No original thought?
Or, is it just nothing?
What no reply??? Nothing to demonstrate your facility at documenting what you say? No original thought?
Or, is it just nothing?
SnailTeeth · 36-40, M
Everything you write is complex, I need to get my Little Orphan Annie Secret Decoder Ring. brb
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@SnailTeeth
Not my fault you don't understand. Short version.
Biden is a traitor.
He has sold nuclear technology to the people who want to blow us up.
My post outlined how it was done.
If he were a normal citizen, he would executed.
Not my fault you don't understand. Short version.
Biden is a traitor.
He has sold nuclear technology to the people who want to blow us up.
My post outlined how it was done.
If he were a normal citizen, he would executed.