JK Rowling is not transphobic

and there is no evidence to back that up. Just a bunch of people lookin to be outraged and play victim.
Guess what people? biology is real and if that hurts your feelings too damn bad. The world should not cater to anyone's delusions and have the nerve to tell people biology is not important.
Transwomen should not be allowed to compete in women's athletics and if you think otherwise, you must not give a shit about women and ignore their rights to fair competition.
Back to JK Rowling though, The things she has said is not transphobic and does not deserve death threats, harassment, abuse and cancellation.

I assume some will say things like well she said this or that and try to justify their witch hunt. So provide actual evidence of her saying this or that and not just post a link to some moronic journalist looking to outrage people for views and clicks and just ignore any semblance of reality..
You wont be able to though because again she has said nothing Transphobic

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Ryannnnnn · 31-35, M

I don't think the majority of people are/were arguing that biological sex isn't real. If anything it supports the findings of scientists regarding the difference in brain activity in those born into gender dysphoria, finding that those born female in this context had male orientated brains and vice versa.

The main discussion has been around how much of the idea of masculinity and femininity is socially constructed and what is innate. It's mostly just a minority in the opinion that biological sex doesn't exist entirely, they're just more noticable in the public eye and thus a narrative gets formed that it's the main opinion amongst those who may be questioning the normative ideas of gender identity.