Could gender fluidity be a sign of evolution?

The book “The origin of the species” is a very vague book concerning humankind. The book was written for non-specialist readers and attracted widespread interest upon its publication. Darwin was already highly regarded as a scientist, so his findings were taken seriously and the evidence he presented generated scientific, philosophical, and religious discussion. The debate over the book contributed to the campaign by T. H. Huxley and his fellow members of the X Club to secularise science by promoting scientific naturalism. Within two decades, there was widespread scientific agreement that evolution, with a branching pattern of common descent, had occurred, but scientists were slow to give natural selection the significance that Darwin thought appropriate. During "the eclipse of Darwinism" from the 1880s to the 1930s, various other mechanisms of evolution were given more credit. With the development of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1930s and 1940s, Darwin's concept of evolutionary adaptation through natural selection became central to modern evolutionary theory, and it has now become the unifying concept of the life sciences.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

There are two genders, and two kinds of gender fluids.

in10RjFox · M

@SW-User concept of gender itself is a belief and man made. We are not opposite sexes but complimenting sexes of the same gender that has no bearing on the genitals. The root cause is the blind belief which is followed as a tradition.

Girls are equally capable of being husbands and fathers which are roles, but purposely made as wives and mothers and slaves of men in patriarchy.

Until humanity wakes up to this fact, gender divisions shall pose a lot of problem.

SW-User

@in10RjFox That makes no sense. Is a bird's sense of gender a bird-made false perception?

in10RjFox · M

@SW-User explain what is bird's sense of gender and then ask what has that got to do with gender being opposite.

We generally accept many concepts during our childhood just from our own perception. One such concept is gender.

If you were given a questionnaire to select your gender, you would have found it as nonsensical. 😀

SW-User

@in10RjFox If you're trying to convince people that male and female is an illusion you're failing miserably.

in10RjFox · M

@SW-User it's not an illusion but just the basic. The illusion is in how the gender was used to make one superior and the other inferior.

The word by itself has the word hood in it as manhood and womanhood.. right?

So why can't female wear the manhood?

How was psychological aspect determined based on a physical aspect?

SW-User

@in10RjFox Sounds like a pointless academic pursuit.

in10RjFox · M

@SW-User that's how our brain's are conditioned by our education system. It's pointless to you because your mind is not willing to process

There would not have been LGBTQ or gender fluids if it was pointless.

How do you know that there are two kinds of gender fluids?

in10RjFox · M

Gender fluid means a person embraces an adaptable nature to the concept of gender identity and gender expression. They can be one gender, multiple genders, or no gender. Gender neutral is often a term used to describe people of any gender.

👆 What do you say for this? You can simply type gender fluid on your browser to read the above.

SW-User

@in10RjFox I made a simple joke your mind failed to process: actual fluids the male and female produce in order to successfully copulate and reproduce.

in10RjFox · M

@SW-User

actual fluids the male and female produce in order to successfully copulate

😂🤣 Yes. I didn't quite catch it.