This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Quizzical · 46-50, M
A parade for being genetically straight is just as fucking ridiculous as having one for being, left-handed, or red-headed... Or LGBT for that matter.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@daisymay Perhaps in the beginning it was a fight against discrimination... NOW it's about flaunting being different and somehow special... Usually by dancing around in tighty-whiteys covered in glitter 🙄
Gay Pride should be something closer to Black History month where ACTUAL achievements can be celebrated and taken pride in, but with the past discrimination not being forgotten.
And this isn't a right-wing, heterosexual saying this... I'm left-wing and bisexual.
Gay Pride marches/festivals do not represent the majority of LGBT people, and are becoming an embarrassment. It's my belief they are actually causing more division than social union in the form they currently take.
People cannot be forced to accept something that is alien to them... They have to get used to it over time. Mainly by recognising similarities rather than having differences rammed down their throats.
Gay Pride should be something closer to Black History month where ACTUAL achievements can be celebrated and taken pride in, but with the past discrimination not being forgotten.
And this isn't a right-wing, heterosexual saying this... I'm left-wing and bisexual.
Gay Pride marches/festivals do not represent the majority of LGBT people, and are becoming an embarrassment. It's my belief they are actually causing more division than social union in the form they currently take.
People cannot be forced to accept something that is alien to them... They have to get used to it over time. Mainly by recognising similarities rather than having differences rammed down their throats.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@daisymay Well, your phrasing (and sarcasm) there imply that there ISN'T a Homosexual Agenda, when of course there is. It's an agenda of equality and acceptance.
Which I don't have an issue with really. In a perfect world we SHOULD all be treated equally.
But as I've said, you can't force that to happen. Certainly not so by promoting an image that all gay people are leather daddies, muscle-marys, drag-queens and bull-dykes obsessed with rainbows and glitter.
It's not representative of the average gay person on the street, who, apart from who they find attractive are pretty much just the same as any heterosexual person.
Similarity draws people together, difference drives them apart, and bombarding people with imagery through the media of the more 'outre' aspects of 'the scene' is certainly NOT going to highlight similarities.
In fact, bombarding anyone with something constantly is eventually just going to piss them off and cause a reaction.
We see it all the time in the media these days. A character whose defining characteristic is that they are gay, inserted to tick certain minority boxes. Inevitably they are also usually camper than Christmas to REALLY hammer home that they are gay. It's ridiculous, it's not representative of real gay people, and it feels so obviously forced. It's everywhere you look, and it's not really helping anyone.
So, yes, it's theoretically possible to avoid it, but only if someone disengages themselves from all forms of mass entertainment.
Which I don't have an issue with really. In a perfect world we SHOULD all be treated equally.
But as I've said, you can't force that to happen. Certainly not so by promoting an image that all gay people are leather daddies, muscle-marys, drag-queens and bull-dykes obsessed with rainbows and glitter.
It's not representative of the average gay person on the street, who, apart from who they find attractive are pretty much just the same as any heterosexual person.
Similarity draws people together, difference drives them apart, and bombarding people with imagery through the media of the more 'outre' aspects of 'the scene' is certainly NOT going to highlight similarities.
In fact, bombarding anyone with something constantly is eventually just going to piss them off and cause a reaction.
We see it all the time in the media these days. A character whose defining characteristic is that they are gay, inserted to tick certain minority boxes. Inevitably they are also usually camper than Christmas to REALLY hammer home that they are gay. It's ridiculous, it's not representative of real gay people, and it feels so obviously forced. It's everywhere you look, and it's not really helping anyone.
So, yes, it's theoretically possible to avoid it, but only if someone disengages themselves from all forms of mass entertainment.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@daisymay Well, look at it this way.
Who was more successful in getting things changed? Martin Luther King Jr, or Malcolm Little?
The man who worked WITH the system, or the guy fighting AGAINST the system?
You seem to be under the misapprehension that 'rights' are automatic upon birth. They are not. Rights are a luxury afforded us by the rich and powerful. They can be given, and they can be taken away.
If tomorrow homosexuality was outlawed those 'rights' would evaporate into nothingness... So the concepts of please and thank you are not totally outlandish really.
Who was more successful in getting things changed? Martin Luther King Jr, or Malcolm Little?
The man who worked WITH the system, or the guy fighting AGAINST the system?
You seem to be under the misapprehension that 'rights' are automatic upon birth. They are not. Rights are a luxury afforded us by the rich and powerful. They can be given, and they can be taken away.
If tomorrow homosexuality was outlawed those 'rights' would evaporate into nothingness... So the concepts of please and thank you are not totally outlandish really.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Quizzical Well, shit, since it's all a lie, why don't we just flip the script on the straights? Let's take their rights away and start oppressing them for being heterosexuals.
I don't like your "hide and watch and wait and see and beg for the right to exist" plan. It sucks and is dangerous.
I don't like your "hide and watch and wait and see and beg for the right to exist" plan. It sucks and is dangerous.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@daisymay You can't oppress a superior force, lol
You can only oppress when you are in a position of power and authority.
The current plan of being out and loud and proud and as camp as possible isn't a) working, or b) representative of the majority of LGBT people. As I say, it's pretty much damaging relations these days because so many people are sick to death of it. In fact, people are generally sick of being told what they can say, what they can think, how they are supposed to react. You push folks far enough, and eventually they start to push back. The far-left just doesn't understand this because they are so caught up in their own self-righteousness.
You can only oppress when you are in a position of power and authority.
The current plan of being out and loud and proud and as camp as possible isn't a) working, or b) representative of the majority of LGBT people. As I say, it's pretty much damaging relations these days because so many people are sick to death of it. In fact, people are generally sick of being told what they can say, what they can think, how they are supposed to react. You push folks far enough, and eventually they start to push back. The far-left just doesn't understand this because they are so caught up in their own self-righteousness.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Quizzical Having a pride parade isn't pushing things.
[quote]In fact, people are generally sick of being told what they can say, what they can think, how they are supposed to react.[/quote]
Well, I guess they should work to change the laws that force them to do those things....oh, hey wait a minute!
[quote]so many people are sick to death of it[/quote]
You mean bigots. I honestly don't give a shit what a bigot thinks.
I'm done trying to convince you to be an ally, I will not beg for being allowed to exist and I resent your insinuation that I should. Goodbye now.
[quote]In fact, people are generally sick of being told what they can say, what they can think, how they are supposed to react.[/quote]
Well, I guess they should work to change the laws that force them to do those things....oh, hey wait a minute!
[quote]so many people are sick to death of it[/quote]
You mean bigots. I honestly don't give a shit what a bigot thinks.
I'm done trying to convince you to be an ally, I will not beg for being allowed to exist and I resent your insinuation that I should. Goodbye now.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@daisymay I'm not an ally... I'm actually part of the LGBT community. I guess you missed me saying that earlier though.
And no these people are not bigots, they are just normal, everyday folks getting tired of being dictated to and having ideologies (from both sides of the political spectrum admittedly) rammed down their throats.
But the community can keep on with this current strategy if they want to. I just predict stronger and stronger backlashes against it.
Subtlety is far more useful in most situations than screaming defiance.
And no these people are not bigots, they are just normal, everyday folks getting tired of being dictated to and having ideologies (from both sides of the political spectrum admittedly) rammed down their throats.
But the community can keep on with this current strategy if they want to. I just predict stronger and stronger backlashes against it.
Subtlety is far more useful in most situations than screaming defiance.