even though she still does blame pro-choice groups for "misinformation" and "fear-mongering", this is a reflection piece on her first pregnancy a year ago.
"But Cammack, who opposes abortion and co-chairs the House pro-life caucus, told the Wall Street Journal she blames messaging from pro-abortion groups for delaying her treatment, which is not banned under Florida’s restrictive statutes, who have created fear of criminal charges.
"Over a year later and once again pregnant and due to give birth soon, Cammack says the politics of the incident have stuck with her.
“It was absolute fearmongering at its worst,” Cammack told the publication, but acknowledged that abortion rights groups might interpret her experience differently and blame Republican-led, restrictive anti-abortion laws for the issue."
Source: The Guardian
Take it as you will, however, this was created to flame more flames of hate.
I also want to know what "care" she got, knowing what I know about etopic pregnancies.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I'm confused how more choices and less criminals laws delayed her care?
It would seems like the opposite would be true, les choices and more criminal laws would have delayed her care, which is seemingly what she's fighting for.
@sstronaut That is really the point. The right allowed the creation of ambiguous laws being created state by state. These ambiguous laws made it so doctors don't have clear guidance on how to treat pregnant women with issues, therefore, making them unable to treat them for fear of being sued and losing their license.
As it stands, there are only two options with an etopic pregnancy: death or medical treatment, better known as an abortion surgery. So...if she didn't have the necessary treatment, how is she alive to have a second pregnancy? She can call her treatment of the etopic pregnancy whatever she wants to console her mind, but she had an abortion. It is the only other option.
