If you were practicing criminal law…
Would you prefer being in the position of prosecuting the accused, or defending them ?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ABCDEF7 · M
Your objective as a lawyer should to uncover the truth by way of legal discussion under the court of law. Which side you are doesn't matter, if your intention is to examine everything to reach the truth.
I would not frame false acquisitions if I were a prosecutor, nor I will develop false evidences to protect a criminal.
I would not frame false acquisitions if I were a prosecutor, nor I will develop false evidences to protect a criminal.
bijouxbroussard · F
@ABCDEF7 That’s the purest definition of advocacy, either for the state or the individual. And while nobody [b]admits[/b] to seeking false evidence to acquit or convict those accused, it is an unfortunate truth (in the U.S.) that the outcome has as much to do with the money spent on defense as it does the facts of the case.
The prosecution generally has unlimited resources.
The prosecution generally has unlimited resources.