Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

There's Still One Recourse for SCOTUS Liars

There’s still one recourse for Supreme Court justices who lied at their confirmations | Opinion BY BRIAN VUKADINOVICH SPECIAL TO THE KANSAS CITY STAR UPDATED JULY 18, 2024 1:24 PM

Read more at: https://www.tri-cityherald.com/opinion/article290122299.html#storylink=cpy

The Supreme Court is at a nadir and the country is at a loss as to what needs to be done to cure us of the infected nature of the court. First it was overturning Roe v. Wade, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States. Then it was the recent ruling in Snyder v. United States, allowing public officials to in effect take bribes in the way of “gratuities” and “rewards.” And now it is the recent ruling in Trump v. United States, which holds that presidents should enjoy “absolute immunity” for so called “official acts,” which in essence means that a president could even commit premeditated murder, and it would not be a crime — as long as the president declared the murder an “official act.”

The lunacy of this court is mind boggling. People all over the country, and even around the world, are rolling their eyes in disbelief that the Supreme Court of the United States would do such a thing — but it did. People feel that there is nothing that can be done about Supreme Court justices who obviously lied during their Senate confirmation hearings when they testified under oath that “nobody is above the law” — including the president. Chief Justice John Roberts testified at his confirmation hearing: “No one is above the law under our system and that includes the president. The president is fully bound by the law.” Justice Samuel Alito testified at his confirmation hearing that “no person in this country is above the law, and that includes the president and it includes the Supreme Court.”
Justice Neil Gorsuch testified at his Senate confirmation hearing, “No man is above the law.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh testified at his confirmation hearing, “No one is above the law in our constitutional system.”

We don’t know whether the justices have changed their minds since that time. But today, we can judge their testimony as untrue, as each of them voted to grant absolute immunity to Trump, as long as the crime by the president could be considered an “official act.” In essence, all these justices committed perjury at their Senate confirmation hearings, which is a crime under Title 18 of U.S. Code. Under the law, witnesses commit perjury “after having taken an oath” to testify under penalty of perjury if they “knowingly and willfully” make “any material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation” with respect to “any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress.” Under the law, the perjury committed by these justices at their respective Senate confirmation hearings could subject them to fines or imprisonment of up to five years, or both.

It is more than clear that the testimony of each of these justices were false statements made under oath to Congress, and consequently were acts of perjury. The question begging an answer: Why isn’t the United States Department of Justice pursuing federal criminal charges against each of these dishonest justices? They broke the law when they falsely testified to Congress, which makes them criminals — and criminals belong in prison, even criminals who wear black robes.

These justices could be impeached, but we know that isn’t going to happen in light of the intense political climate in the House and Senate these days. The politics are too deep and too far out of control, and the politicians of today don’t have the courage actually to do what needs to be done to rid us of these judicial miscreants. The only real chance that we have as a country to rid ourselves of them is for the Justice Department to step in, enforce the laws of the land and prosecute each of these so called “justices” who clearly lied at the Senate confirmation hearings. Not to do so — and to allow these people to continue on with no accountability for their conduct, even though there are laws on the books to prosecute them for lying to Congress — would essentially mean that the old axiom, “Nobody is above the law,” would have to be reworded to “Nobody is above the law — except lying members of the United States Supreme Court.”

Brian Vukadinovich is the former executive director of the Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s and the author of “Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case” and “Rogues in Black Robes.” He lives in Wheatfield, Indiana.
sree251 · 41-45, M
First it was overturning Roe v. Wade, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States.

SCOTUS did not overturn Roe V Wade. The previous decision wasn't repealed or rescinded. It still stands. It was determined to be an incorrect interpretation. The new decision returns the authority to enforce abortion legislation to the States. This is consistent with States' right in the US.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@sree251 The problem with that is that it's dangerous for the women and children (Yes, I said children) who live in states where they can't access abortions. You think they can just up and move a few hundred miles to go get that miscarriage taken care of?
sree251 · 41-45, M
@LordShadowfire
The problem with that is that it's dangerous for the women and children (Yes, I said children) who live in states where they can't access abortions.

Access to abortion is not a trifle matter to folks who take life seriously. If you don't take life seriously, you had better not live among those who do. America is a free country. Homosexuals move away from small towns to live in big cities where alternate lifestyles are allowed to flourish. Small town folks have a right to flourish also.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
masterofyou · 70-79, M
Babies have rights too....
JSul3 · 70-79
@masterofyou The demographic breakdowns to the total (as of May 28) of 36,906 dead suggests that more than 11,000 children, about 7,000 women, and nearly 3,000 elderly people have been killed in this assault. In other words, around 60 percent of those killed were clearly not combatants. But we can’t assume that every adult male is a combatant. If we assume that the number of noncombatant men who have been killed equals the number of women killed, which is equivalent to about half of the roughly 14,000 adult male deaths, we can estimate that around 80 percent of the Gazans killed have been civilians.
masterofyou · 70-79, M
@JSul3 okay if you don't like it here then leave, don't try to convince me with all that bogus information that you post

Trump is going to win BIGGGGGG
JSul3 · 70-79
@masterofyou Born in the USA...1952.

You deny truth and fact....the typical poorly educated that your Orange Messiah loves so much.
masterofyou · 70-79, M
I hate to say this, but your totally messed up in the head, you need much help....
JSul3 · 70-79
@masterofyou You cant handle truth and facts.
Lying under oath is fine now, right?
JSul3 · 70-79
Israel supports abortion.

The rights to a woman’s body are those of the woman alone,” said Israel Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz in the statement.

“The move by the US Supreme Court to deny women control of their bodies is a backward move, oppressing women and setting back the leader of the free and liberal world by a hundred years,” Horowitz said.
In 2016, (details below) SCOTUS overturned the conviction of a republican governor based on a very narrow definition of "official acts."

Earlier this month, SCOTUS greatly broadened presidential immunity by greatly broadening and muddying the definition "official acts." C'mon SCOTUS, you can't have it both ways!!

On June 27, the US Supreme Court unanimously vacated former Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell’s corruption conviction and erected a higher hurdle for federal bribery prosecutions. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s overbroad definition of the term “official act” in favor of a narrow construction, concluding that arranging a meeting, speaking to another official, or organizing an event—without further action—is insufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 201.
https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2016/06/supreme-courts-interpretation-of-official-act-poses-new-challenge
redredred · M
This SCOTUS is amongst the greatest in our nations history, so great it can get by with the wise Latina and Katangi-Brown chipping in inanities from the sidelines.
masterofyou · 70-79, M
Babies have rights to live even though you live in Texas and hate your State and Country....
JSul3 · 70-79
@masterofyou Texas has the worst healthcare...has the highest infant mortality rate.
Abbott and his pals don't care about any babies. Babies have been born. Abbott and his pals only care about what's in the womb. After birth, they don't care.
masterofyou · 70-79, M
Go live in Iran if you don't like the USA
So then, you support the cold blooded butchery of the unborn, gotcha.
JSul3 · 70-79
@NativePortlander1970 BS.
Got proof?
@JSul3
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/abortion-in-the-us-what-you-need-to-know/
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@masterofyou So lying under oath is ok.
Got it.
So much for the rule of law.

 
Post Comment