This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
Have heard warnings if they show up at the Supreme Court they are risking their life. They better not do it.
4meAndyou · F
@cherokeepatti Thank you for mentioning that. Upchuck Schumer and his political agitators might WANT people to die...but no one in their right minds wants that...all differences of politics aside.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@4meAndyou I heard someone who is connected to military intelligence say “Don’t even think about it”…stern warning. But if these asshats want to do it anyway they are in a for a rude awakening.
@cherokeepatti If there is/ are any mass gatherings outside of the Supreme Court, rest assured they will have ahead of time been admonished by the Democrats to not act like the 6 Jan. Event. Why? 1. It would make the democrats and their commission look hypocritical and 2. If disturbances occur, those so offended by 6 Jan. will eat crow as that would be looked on as the mob trying to overturn the law of the land as spelled out by the Supreme Court.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@soar2newhighs Instead they go to the homes of the justices and pull their protests there.
@cherokeepatti Well if they do it peacefully. Or are there laws/,rules that spell out such activities( done peacefully?)
Guarantee Schumer wouldn’t be in any. He’s a loudmouth and a coward.
Guarantee Schumer wouldn’t be in any. He’s a loudmouth and a coward.
4meAndyou · F
@soar2newhighs There is a federal law against trying to influence judges, and Garland refuses to enforce it.