Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Dolimyte · 41-45, M
That's a pretty messed up question. Wtf?
NerdyPotato · M
Both are bad, but child abuse is worse.
Morvoren · F
Why are you making a choice? Stop both.
SW-User
Not a comparison at all.
Both are without reproach.
Both are without reproach.
Umile · 41-45, F
Both
LilPrincess · 46-50, F
Both
TexChik · F
Children of course, however abusing animals is disgusting
Magenta · F
Both make me rage, but starving children may be a tad worse.
Oh for goodness sake. Starving children.
Primnproper · 56-60, F
Neither are in any way acceptable
choosing between hell and hell
JordanianBebe · 22-25, F
Both are terrible 💔
AnonymousUsing · 22-25, M
Neither.