for the clowns on here who defend drag queens around children

how do you defend this? still think there is nothing wrong with this type of thing?
[media=https://youtu.be/1UIZ8PwCKFg]

what kind of parents take their kids to be around this disgusting crap?
no wonder so many people get called groomers these days. there is good reason for it

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

fakable · T

i don't really care, but...

when publishing such posts you should try to prevent the reaction of aggressive idiots. although the point of the news is logically correct, you have made some mistakes in the way the news is presented. this is most likely caused by your emotional reaction...

Torsten · 36-40, M

@fakable what mistakes did i make?

fakable · T

@Torsten

a lot...

1. "for the clowns on here who defend drag queens around children"

those who disagree with my statement are not competent and do not deserve respect. join my opinion and feel part of a competent group.

2. "how do you defend this?"

i need an enemy. an incompetent weak enemy. a clown who defends a deliberately wrong opinion.

3. "still think there is nothing wrong with this type of thing?"

distortion of the meaning of the message. "this type of thing?" is now associated in the reader with the presence of "drag queens around children." as far as i understand the news is that the show organizers are idiots, not dancers (drag queens) right?

4. "what kind of parents take their kids to be around this disgusting crap?"

the transition to the theme of parents through the weighting of negative attitudes to the previous theme of "drag queens around children" equates to "this disgusting crap.

5. "no wonder so many people get called groomers these days. there is a good reason for it"

the parents of these children are idiots, too, for allowing their children to be around "this disgusting crap". i.e., "around drag queens". of course, this is an understandable and not at all surprising fact.

---

after reading your post, the user watches the video with an already formed opinion, which you put into the emotional form of the text.

maybe you did it deliberately. then you are a professional. maybe not. i have no idea.

Torsten · 36-40, M

@fakable are you serious? anyone who watches that video should only have one clear cut opinion and that is that this is not okay.
I stick with anyone who defends such a thing as to be a groomer. There is no other word for it.

Parents who take their children to essentially a strip show is a shitty parent that in my opinion has just committed child abuse.

you say the performers are not idiots here? umm they see children there and yet they are doing that. Passing blame to others is idiotic because its what they are doing is what the issue is

fakable · T

@Torsten

i took apart your post as a textual construction into its emotional and logical components

i don't care what your post is about. i showed you the mechanism

seriously