I'm tired of this word "Woke"

Can someone please explain to me what you believe "Woke" is, and how it violates anyone's Constitution Rights, or violates the Constitution outright in it's ideas and expectations.

I'd really like to know. 🤷‍♂️

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M

Being woke is claiming an insight to societal persecutions that the average person is unaware of

Whoever told you it was a violation was wrong but it does go against the spirit of the constitution because it presupposes that we are not equal beings in the treatments we deserve when it comes to its prescriptions or its assumptions.

Here's how that applies to you. You tried to tell me not to use words because they sound like Hitler despite the fact that he didn't invent that manner of speaking and to which you have used similar speech in reference to police that mass shooters who have anti-cop sentiments have also used(funnily enough you are doing it in this very post). Do you "want to use the words of a mad man?"

And because you have bought and tried to perpetuate a narrative simply because of an association of words deemed too close to the big bad Nazi man, that it defines you, is why you are tired of the word

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@Jackaloftheazuresand Does his phrasing conclude that one's rights are being violated?

Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M

@JohnnySpot Who, Cali? You should ask him

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@Jackaloftheazuresand Ohhh I didn't know the OP was personal I think lol. I answered thinking they were asking generally and not directed at anyone specific.

calicuz · 56-60, M

@JohnnySpot

Yes, I want to know if people think their, or someone else's rights are being violated by what they believe "Woke" to be.

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@Jackaloftheazuresand I was asking if you thought his question was a "leading" question.
Example of a leading question; Why did we have to bomb Japan?

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@calicuz "....and how or (how it does not) violate..."

calicuz · 56-60, M

@JohnnySpot

that's my point, opinions do not violate the Constitution.

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@calicuz The way the post is phrased one would have to give the reader credit to understand woke may not violate constitutional rights.
The way the post is phrased slightly hints that it does violate constitutional rights.
I am only splitting hairs here over the grammar.
Why did we have to bomb Japan?
This question implies that we did have to bomb Japan.
Did we have to bomb Japan?
This question does not assume the necessity.

calicuz · 56-60, M

@JohnnySpot

I understand, and no, we didn't have to bomb Japan, unless the bombing of Japan was required to gain knowledge on real time effects of nuclear bombs through human experiment.

My question did hint that ideas and opinions aren't a bad thing if they do not threaten the Constitution, which is what gives us the right to express our ideas and opinions.

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@calicuz by the way an individual private citizen cannot violate another's constitutional rights unless in conspiracy with the government.

calicuz · 56-60, M

@JohnnySpot

I disagree. If your neighbor puts a hidden camera in your home while you're away, that neighbor is violating your Constitutional right to privacy at the very least.

JohnnySpot · 56-60, M

@calicuz It would be labeled a different way, look it up, no offense.

calicuz · 56-60, M

@JohnnySpot

No offense taken.