Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you approve of this proposed law?

The Kentucky Repubs want to pass a law that will authorize people to legally kill homeless people who set foot on their property.

Republicans Push To Legalize ‘Property Owners’ Killing Homeless People in Kentucky
In Kentucky, politicians are preparing to vote on a law that would authorize the use of force against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property.


"Republican politicians in Kentucky are rallying behind a new bill that would authorize the use of force—and potentially deadly force—against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property. The bill would also criminalize unsanctioned homeless encampments and restrict cities and towns from preempting state laws.

The bill, known as the “Safer Kentucky Act,” or HB5, would target homelessness, drug possession and mental illness by drastically increasing criminal penalties for a range of offenses. Introduced last week by Republican state representative Jared Bauman, it already has 52 sponsors in Kentucky’s House of Representatives. A vote is scheduled for this week."

"Advocates are most alarmed by one aspect of the “Safer Kentucky Act” in particular: an anti-homeless provision that would authorize violence by property owners on people camping on their property. The bill says the use of force is “justifiable” if a defendant believes that criminal trespass, robbery or “unlawful camping” is occurring on their property.

In addition, it says that “deadly physical force” is justifiable if a defendant believes that someone is trying to “dispossess” them of their property or is attempting a robbery or committing arson, language that could also have ramifications for tenants overstaying their lease."
https://www.vice.com/en/article/jg54mg/republicans-push-to-legalize-property-owners-killing-homeless-people-in-kentucky

Should this become a law in every State or should the Repubs be voted out of office forever?

Notice that all a person has to do is "believe" that someone is doing a prohibited act and then he can kill the person without any reprecussions. Of course the Slave Patrol approves of that and even says that it doesn't go far enough.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Torsten · 36-40, M
easy solution to this and that is stay the hell out of others property. It aint hard to do
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@Torsten Yes, because there are never any property line disputes between neighbours or businesses or Governments - everyone has such clear property lines and boundaries.

Even the courts have difficulty in working out where property starts and finishes at times.
MethDozer · M
@Torsten right to roam man
Torsten · 36-40, M
@Zeusdelight key words there are "at times", that is not the norm and most people know their property lines
Torsten · 36-40, M
@MethDozer sure, just not on others property
MethDozer · M
@Torsten Not posted nobody knows.

Still, no justifiable right to just kill someone. That's psychotic
Torsten · 36-40, M
@MethDozer never said its justified in most cases. If its the law though (like it already is in some places), im just saying there is a easy way to avoid it and thats to stay off of others property
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@Torsten "At times" in courts, means that the owners can't agree, the surveyors cannot agree, the lawyers cannot reach an agreement and then the Judges are stumped. That may be rare, but it happens.

Most people think they know their property lines, but the disputes indicate they are mostly wrong.

Most people buy a piece of land and assume what they have bought is correct.

It is a stupid ignorant law.