Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are you anti-vaccination or pro-vaccination?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Oster1 · M
For the most part, anti. Once one learns of the non important ingredients added, it can be an eye opener. Read the insert with a super magnifying glass. There are many damages paid out every year and worse. This comes out of another fund, set aside after Congress gave Pharma immunity in case law.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
@Oster1
non important ingredients added
you mean like the food & drink you consume on a daily basis?
Oster1 · M
@wildbill83 Yes, that too!
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
@Oster1 guess you should stop eating then... 🤔
Oster1 · M
@wildbill83 Actually I was referring to aluminum, thimerosal, formaldehyde, Mercury, etc. This is very easy to research and only my opinion. I also believe your analogy is a little extreme, no? If vaccines worked so well, why be afraid of a couple of unvaccinated kids in a class room?
SW-User
@Oster1 not everyone can get vaccinated and they never work 100%. That's why herd immunity is an essential part.

Also, you may want to look up the difference between atoms and molecules before worrying about aluminium and mercury.

And finally, the other things you mention are present in the human body by nature anyway.
@SW-User About how natural herd immunity was improving way before vaccines were introduced:
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vlqyj_uyzBc&list=PL4g2nQuX-lOp_XkMEd0rPJlwY-IGiwpmp&index=2]



From his book 'Health and Healing' Dr Andrew Weil best answers it with this statement:

"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunisations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc, were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water."

From http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/web1.html
SW-User
@sunlight yeah, hygiene helps of course. But it's not a full replacement of vaccines.
@sunlight really horrifying if its true.

Science might in its rank ignorance be making us sick. Only a million examples or more.
@SW-User the evidence says Sunlight is right.
SW-User
@Whiterosesociety what evidence? A few internet publications don't refute thousands of peer reviewed scientific researches.
Yulianna · 26-30, F
@sunlight this man is totally discredited
@SW-User the idea of censorship never deters anyone who wants to ignore that it is owned mostly by the new world order...the internet that is.

Also the body never learned to type. And its spellchecker works much better.
SW-User
@Whiterosesociety just show me some or reviewed evidence of people who know what they are talking about and I'll take a close look. If it confuses atoms with molecules though, I'm done and refer them back to the very first chemistry lesson everyone gets in highschool.