This post may contain Adult content.
AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Circumcision, less is more

Circumcision is proof that sometimes less is more. His loss is my gain. Circumcision makes the man's penis less sensitive. That might lower the upper limit of how much sensation and enjoyment they can get from their penis, but at the same time, they'll last longer. The foreskin acts as a natural lubricant, gliding back and forth. This can be useful if the guy is rather large, but for the most part, the lack of a foreskin and the direct stimulation help to make him feel bigger. Scars can be sexy, especially when they undeniably mark that a penis made a sacrifice for my benefit. Lastly, a nice tight circumcision will make it a little harder for the guy to wank. That just forces him to give a little more attention to his partner to make sure she helps him get off. Circumcision is the perfect sexual equalizer. Men's bits are on the outside, easily accessible and easy to work with. Making it a tiny bit harder for men to get themselves off makes it just a tiny bit more likely they'll put in the effort to get their partners off. Circumcision, less for him, but more for his partner.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
It definitely more sanitary being cut
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Docdon23 · M
@Bill1372 This is definitely not true--it is genital mutilation and studies show it does not make a penis more sanitary, not in countries with showers and available water!!! By your logic we should cut off ears and female labia and clitoral hoods for cleanliness...
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
@Docdon23 I’m not saying I agree with it but it’s undoubtedly more sanitary. It’s really common sense. That skin hanging over, catching sweat, a drop of urine, etc… Never heard of a cut guy with smegma..
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Docdon23 · M
@Bill1372 I never had smegma either, and shower daily--and enjoy washing under my foreskin. Do you realize that in the US circumcision became "popular" in the late 1800s by a guy named Kellogg--the cereal guy--who called for male and female circumcision to reduce pleasure and stop masturbation. For some reason female circumcision is now illegal but male, a clear violation of an innocent infant boy's rights. And honestly, why would any adult male choose to remove the most sensitive, pleasurable part of his body? "I want my son to look like me" and "they look better" are not valid reasons for violating an infant's rights.
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
@swirlie so close minded to make assumptions as you do. I shower twice a day most days. I would imagine it’s deflecting from the real issue I uncovered. I obviously hit a nerve
swirlie · 31-35
@Bill1372
The real issue that you have uncovered about yourself Bill, is that you assume that uncircumcised men are unclean, only because you know what unclean must be all about for them if you are a circumcised male who doesn't bathe regularly either.

It takes one to know one, Bill and if you are unclean yourself, you are only projecting your thoughts onto how it must be for those who are uncircumcised who have poor hygienic habits as well.

I obviously hit a nerve when I uncovered that truth about you, huh? 🛁
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
@swirlie you can see your gyno for help
swirlie · 31-35
@Bill1372
This is not about me Bill, this is strictly about your self-projection onto those around you. You are projecting onto others what you witness of your 'self'.
Docdon23 · M
@swirlie I wonder...should we remove eyelids? Are eyes dirty? It is the same skin as foreskin...what about our tongues (it has a frenulum as well)...was reading an article that explained in the US the medical community used to see circumcision as preventing masturbation, but when that did not work they reworked their fake message to cleanliness--it is a multibillion dollar industry cutting off part of baby boy's penises for no valid medical reason. The article also explained that in European countries with very low circumcision rates they do not have any increase in penile diseases or issues, in fact have fewer because they do not have medical complications of circumcision!! This is a sham!!
swirlie · 31-35
@Docdon23
My ancestry is Scandinavian and the ONLY time a guy is circumcised in Scandinavian countries is if he has a medical complication that would be life threatening to him if circumcision was not accomplished.

I went to school in Canada and while in high school and university, I had a preferential bias for guys who were not circumcised. This is because I was raised and educated with the understanding that foreskin is normal, in addition to the fact that I actually like it's appearance and texture.

Others in my social circles were not excluded from those circles because they had been circumcised at birth, despite the vast majority of men in North America being circumcised.

Every summer when my sisters and I would go over to Scandinavia to visit with cousins, I learned the meaning of 'open relationships' when I was a teenager. Every guy I ever met in Sweden, Denmark or The Netherlands was uncircumcised and when I raised issue with circumcision one time, my female cousins and their friends admitted to me that they had never actually seen a guy who'd been circumcised and so they questioned me for even asking about it.
Bill1372 · 51-55, M